• IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 month ago

    Glad that he eventually got it fixed.

    Fortunately, Lifeward eventually capitulated and Straight was able to get his exoskeleton repaired — but that was only after an intense campaign

    Still, these are the issues that make me question why anyone is excited for products like brain implants. The longer we can go without commercialised body modifications, the better.

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 month ago

      To me, it’s why Right to Repair laws are incredibly necessary. Repair parts, manuals, everything needed to operate and maintain a sold product should be mandated as “must be available to buy from the patent-holder, or the patent expires and the part is legal for anyone to manufacture”.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Shit like this is why we need strong regulations for anything that is a medical device that is depended on by people. I don’t give a shit if it isn’t profitable anymore, these companies need to support their customers that may be significantly impacted if their devices don’t work.

  • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every two years, 99% of voters here in the US choose to put their stamp of approval on capitalism. Then they inexplicably clutch their pearls when capitalists do capitalist things, as if it’s somehow shocking.

    Looks like public pressure brought a positive outcome in this case, so that’s something, but this is the stuff you should consider when voting for the two ruling parties.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 month ago

      You are that guy in the comic about a modern person blaming serfs for the persistence of feudalism.

    • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hey, look at that. It’s the inevitable consequence of the game theory of first past the post voting. Voting system reform is my #1 issue, and if you actually care about the fact that “99% of voters” are locked into voting for someone they dislike to avert disaster every 4 years, it should be yours as well.

      There is no meaningful future for third parties until and unless this occurs. IRV is a good first step, but Score voting is better. Multimember districts are also important. Getting rid of the electoral college is a no-brainer.

      • Floon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Requires a constitutional amendment, which, in case it isn’t obvious, will not happen, as it will require the yea votes of states that currently wield outsized power under the current system.

        • LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          Push for it in your state, first. We’re still in the first few cycles using RCV in Maine (I like STAR better) where folks are learning to love it, but there’s no time like now to get that ball rolling. More people need to experience it to shift the national conversation of “whether we should” to “which should we use”

      • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thank you for your perspective.

        Voting system reform is my #1 issue

        Respectfully, I don’t think it is. You’ve seen the same history I have and, whether you want to acknowledge it or not, you know how your Democratic vote reinforces that which you say you want to change.

    • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      While agree with the sentiment, electorialism will never end capitalism because of the power imbalance where capitalists will spend all their money if they need to for heavy propaganda campaigns in favour of capitalism.

      Your energy is better spent on small scale organising your workplace, to make sure that you and your coworkers can actually use the only leverage you have through strikes.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      US voters are never given the chance to vote for non-capitalist candidates. But this year we actually have a socialist in the running which is why I am voting for Claudia de la Cruz this year.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Disagreeing with politics is as old as humans, one can live in a situation one doesn’t philosophically agree with. Voting does hold aspiration.

          • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            That it does.

            We still have to look at historical patterns and acknowledge that what a person claims to vote for is antithetical to what their party of choice is actually going to do.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      What do you suggest people do then? Protest the vote and take to the streets? Not asking to be a dick, just genuinely curious.

      • rammer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Work inside all of the political institutions to bring about constitutional change. Abolish electoral college etc.

      • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Vote third party and be public about it.

        Protests are a waste, so taking to the streets doesn’t matter much unless you can gather enough people to create a legitimate violent threat.

    • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The amusing thing about the people who complain that capitalists are the root of all problems, they don’t make an effort to correct it.

      Take the situation of this story. If your ideals are pure and would have the popular support of a critical mass of people, there is absolutely not one thing preventing the establishment of a company, chartered as a public good corporation, and ran as a non-profit entity to provide these kind of material goods for people at cost, or if someone is willing to subsidise the production even less so if you like. You could even get the seed money from a crowd sourced campaign, or so called ‘angel investors’ no strings attached, no ownership stakes to distribute.

      • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        they don’t make an effort to correct it.

        An interesting take, but nevertheless, an incorrect one. The individual vote has no power to make significant change at the Federal level unless they’re a billionaire or willing to commit an act of terrorism. (Both of which don’t apply to either of us, I imagine.)

        • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          A vote is a vote, but that’s not the solution I spoke of. Rather than trying to push people to disengage or vote 3rd party, neither of which will make any meaningful difference to the situation (even in the million to one chance some 3rd party did get elected, they’re a politician and will do politician things), why not take the situation into your own hands and create the company run by someone who won’t behave like a capitalist?

          Create the next Google, but you can be the one who really follows the “don’t be evil” mantra and in the process usurp the throne from the capitalists who have gone wrong. Once that is done you have the ability to simply hand the reigns over to anyone working there and walk away knowing the problem of that particular market is now solved.

    • Seraph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      “No longer useful” according the company, as it doesn’t make them money anymore.

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I guess we will see if “there’s no such things as bad publicity” works out for them.

    • brettvitaz@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I certainly don’t agree with the company’s position, but did you read definition 1b? I think you may have stopped reading a little early

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I tripple checked before posting. 1b describes technological fashion.

        Leg prothesis are not out of fashion for people who need them.

        There is no alternative clearly superior v2 product that i could find either.

        • brettvitaz@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Reminder that I don’t like the company’s stance on the matter.

          What you have posted is your interpretation of the definition, which has little legal or practical value. A product does not need a successor, superior or otherwise, to become obsolete. Nothing you have posted has any relation to the definition of obsolete, and are mostly word play.

          That being said, right to repair needs to become a real thing and companies should be supplying repair manuals for items they consider obsolete.

          • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            All i did was a websearch for “Obsolete dictionary meaning”

            Its the interpretation of www.merriam-webster.com which in its own words is “an Encyclopaedia Britannica company, America’s leading provider of language information for more than 180 years.”

            I get that language is semantics, i use a lot of creative liberties with language all the time but i still think that “Not longer enough profit potential” is not covered under the term “Obsolete” You could argue some doubt but its a cold-hearted business, they don’t get the benefit of doubt. Also my expression doesn’t really need legal or practical value. I am glad to have said what i did.

  • B0rax@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    Companies should publish schematics, drawings, 3d files etc when they mark a product obsolete.

    • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t forget to unlock the bootloader on products that have an operating system, so that people can also flash a replacement for it. So many Ipads and Iphones being wasted now.

  • arthur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    If it will go in someone’s body, it should be completely opensource, from hardware to software.

      • arthur@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        True, I had another comment on mind when I wrote it. Someone talking about brain implants. But that’s also valid in this case.