Well shit…

    • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is no different than anything else, we naturally appreciate the skill it takes to create something entirely by hand, even if mass production is available.

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          The games will still be designed by humans. Generative AI will only be used as a tool in the workflow for creating certain assets faster, or for creating certain kinds of interactivity on the fly. It’s not good enough to wholesale create large sets of matching assets, and despite what folks may think, it won’t be for a long time, if ever. Not to mention, people just don’t want that. People want art to have intentional meaning, not computer generated slop.

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Plenty of games still rely on procedural generation to different degrees. It’s a huge selling point in many cases, and in others, it’s a pillar of their genre.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You mean like how people cherish hand drawn animation over digital? Cause except for some niche projects, the majority don’t.

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        People shit on the Hobbit trilogy for the CGI compared to the live action of the LOTR trilogy. This stuff does happen.