• Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Wait, I thought you never said that?

    That paper ignores people’s capacity to pay.

    Even the Bible recognizes that a poor widow’s mite is a bigger ask than a wealthy person’s contribution of a larger portion of their income. That was written two thousand years ago, but somehow conservatives still haven’t come to the same obvious conclusion.

    Our society is specifically set up to funnel money to oligarchs, and then they cry about having to contribute to that system? Boo fucking hoo.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why are you quoting the bible? The bible also says I shouldn’t eat shellfish. Leave your sky God out of the discussion.

      That paper ignores people’s capacity to pay.

      People need to be responsible for their finances. The answer isn’t to make other people pay your way in life. As California and New York learned, people will leave and their budgets are wrecked.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If you actually read what I wrote you’d understand my point.

        Nothing you said to me is a response to my post.

        Try again.

        Your peacocking value judgement is adorable, but irrelevant.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          7 months ago

          No, it answers what you said but you choose to think otherwise.

          I will make it simple for you.

          Elon typically earns 1 dollar per year.

          How much should he pay in taxes on that 1 dollar?

          Your point is invalid. High-income earners already pay more in taxes, not only as a percentage but also as a total of their income.

          You don’t see the irony in wanting others to pay more but not wanting to pay more yourself.

          • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            I will make it simple for you.

            Elon typically earns 1 dollar per year.

            How much should he pay in taxes on that 1 dollar?

            And I’ll add back in the context that you’re desperate to jettison.

            Let’s look at a situation that resembles the real world:

            Elon Musk earns about $1.5 billion dollars/year with an estimated net worth of about $150 billion.

            The median American income is about $70k/year with an estimated net worth of $193k

            Musk should be taxed at 90% like we did for top earners during the biggest economic expansion in our nation’s history.

            Your point is invalid. High-income earners already pay more in taxes, not only as a percentage but also as a total of their income.

            And that wasn’t my point; you’re trying to change the argument because you know you’re wrong.

            You don’t see the irony in wanting others to pay more but not wanting to pay more yourself.

            I would love for you to point out where I said I wouldn’t be willing to pay more in taxes. This accusation is a confession, it seems.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              7 months ago

              Elon Musk earns about $1.5 billion dollars/year with an estimated net worth of about $150 billion.

              False. Elon does not earn $1.5 billion a year. That is not his income. His net worth has nothing to do with his income.

              Musk should be taxed at 90% like we did for top earners during the biggest economic expansion in our nation’s history.

              That is also false. Income was taxed at 90%, not wealth. We have never taxed wealth because it is unconstitutional. Also, the tax code was very different back then, and only 1 person ever paid that level of tax. People had many more deductions than they do now.

              And that wasn’t my point; you’re trying to change the argument because you know you’re wrong. No, I am right, as you demonstrated here that you don’t know the difference between income, wealth, and even how taxes have worked historically.

              I would love for you to point out where I said I wouldn’t be willing to pay more in taxes. This accusation is a confession, it seems.

              How much more do you think your tax bracket should pay to keep the current rates for all the other brackets?

              • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’m done pretending you’re a serious person arguing seriously.

                Anyone can say “nuh-uh.”

                I also never said wealth was taxed. I said his income should be taxed (in response to your question).

                You’re misrepresenting my argument at every step like you always do. Your sealion question at the end is irrelevant; you have no idea how much I earn, and I’m not here to impress Internet strangers like you seem to be. Bet you’re real close to that billion though if you keep grinding!

                Bet it burns you up that you can’t ban me from here.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I also never said wealth was taxed. I said his income should be taxed (in response to your question). then why did you bring up Elon’s wealth?

                  You’re misrepresenting my argument at every step like you always do.

                  Then, be more clear. Don’t blame me because you can’t articulate your thoughts well. You are talking about wealth but claim you are not talking about wealth. Elon does not earn $1.5 billion per year. That is factually inaccurate.

                  Your sealion question at the end is irrelevant; you have no idea how much I earn, and I’m not here to impress Internet strangers like you seem to be. You said you would pay more but when asked, it’s now sealioning? Never asked how much you earned. I asked how much more your bracket should pay since you said you would pay more.

                  Bet you’re real close to that billion though if you keep grinding! Not even close and not even a goal of mine.

                  Bet it burns you up that you can’t ban me from here. It’s so weird you try to turn everything personal instead of having a discussion. Instead of trying to talk about me, why not engage in the discussion?

              • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                7 months ago

                “buy borrow die” is totally income, dude. It’s just not taxed, and step-up basis makes it worse.

                The net worth is used to fund everyday expenses, it is effectively income.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  “buy borrow die” is totally income, dude. It is not income under the law but I have no issues taxing it as income or preventing the practice.

                  If Bernie wasn’t so dumb, that is where he would focus his angst. I suspect few people really understand that is how Elon supports himself through loans and not income.

                  One day, those loans have to be called, but until then, there is no income.

                  • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I wouldn’t be surprised if those loans are repaid without realizing the gain of the collateral. Step-up basis is a huge tax dodge, and tax dodge is theft from all the people who would benefit from the things those taxes could pay for.

                    The way the rich use loans as income is unfair. Therefore the rich do not pay their fair share.