The world’s top chess federation has ruled that transgender women cannot compete in its official events for females until an assessment of gender change is made by its officials.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    222
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Silly question, why does chess, a mental activity, need gendered leagues?

    • jsveiga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      132
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chess at pro level is brutal. One can get mentally mauled if the adversary has a superior, trained for cruel psychological warfare, mind.

      Men just don’t stand a chance.

    • _wintermute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because the whole idea of gendered leagues in games that ultimately don’t matter at all is about segregation and control, not physiology.

      Bring on the down votes from the “but muh sports 'tegridy!” clowns.

      Edit: some of yall need a class on statistics lol

      • maino82@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        All of the pieces. On both sides of the board. Mentally it’s much more taxing keeping track of which pieces are yours. We guys have it really easy with the whole black/white pieces.

        • Quokka@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually women are just better at seeing colour and for them what looks like the same pink to us is actually 17 different shades.

      • crowsby@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And on average, they only start out with 80% of the pieces of the men’s set.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you met chess bros?

      I can see why women would want their own league.

    • superkret@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because otherwise women couldn’t currently compete beyond the local level. But I don’t have an explanation for the difference in playing levels beyond the fact that much fewer women seem to be interested in playing Chess competitively.

        • superkret@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. First of all Chess has nothing to do with being smart in any sense I would use the word.
          Otherwise a Raspberry Pi would outsmart all of humanity.

          Secondly, it’s much more similar to why the Faroe Islands can’t compete in soccer with France.
          Nothing suggests they have less natural talent for soccer (and it’s quite popular there), but there’s just 1/1000 the number of players to draw from.

          • _wintermute@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Whoa, watch out with that logical thinking around here. As has been demonstrated by votes in a comment chain of mine further up the thread, the number of women at the top of the chess scene is totally indicative of womens’ intrinsic ability to play chess. It has nothing to do with the amount of women who play chess vs the amount of men who play chess! /s

            But yeah, it’s simple shit. If men outnumber women 100:1 in the competitive chess scene then obviously we expect women to be extremely under represented at the top. But misogynists gonna misogyny.

        • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is an open bracket (where anyone can play) and a womens bracket, currently women do not perform well enough to play internationally in the open bracket. What they are stating are merely facts. And really were it not for the existence of the womens bracket it is possible that women would perform even worse.

    • who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      So women can play chess without the added mental burdens that come along with being a women in a male dominated space.

    • ex_redditor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not gendered. If there is a female super GM she will be invited to the most prestigious tournaments. But there isn’t any… and that’s a whole other debate

    • whataboutshutup@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Women gated off their league because every their move is commented on as a female one. They can’t fail for it’s deepens the stereotype of women=stupid and they can’t win for it’s just man wasn’t paying attention or played easy for her. The lack of women chess clubs and championships, the stereotype of it being not a sport for women is why there aren’t many high ELO players in this isolated and weird situation.

      One of the last strongholds of a fragile male nerd supremacy, that’s all.