alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIBM promised to back off facial recognition — then it signed a $69.8 million contract to provide itwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1309arrow-down14
arrow-up1305arrow-down1external-linkIBM promised to back off facial recognition — then it signed a $69.8 million contract to provide itwww.theverge.comalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarebobman@unilem.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoHm. So it’s okay for the US government to spy on its citizens but no one else? Not sure why people like you ever bother talking about privacy. You clearly don’t care about it or understand it.
minus-squareCookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoNo its not but at least the shit doesn’t get sold to whoever pays the most. And i care very much about privacy.
minus-squarebobman@unilem.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year ago And i care very much about privacy. Then you should know it’s not a ‘lesser evil’ scenario. Either you have privacy, or you don’t. Choosing who you give up your privacy for is not being private.
minus-squarebobman@unilem.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year ago No its not but at least the shit doesn’t get sold to whoever pays the most Do you have evidence of this happening in China?
Hm. So it’s okay for the US government to spy on its citizens but no one else?
Not sure why people like you ever bother talking about privacy. You clearly don’t care about it or understand it.
No its not but at least the shit doesn’t get sold to whoever pays the most.
And i care very much about privacy.
Then you should know it’s not a ‘lesser evil’ scenario. Either you have privacy, or you don’t.
Choosing who you give up your privacy for is not being private.
Do you have evidence of this happening in China?