• Commiunism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wonder how it’s actually going to be enforced. Judging from the article, it’ll all be up to the tech companies themselves which historically didn’t turn out to be that effective (examples: age fields on services like Discord and Gmail and porn).

    The only effective way I can think of is having to send a picture of your ID but that’s hella invasive

  • sleepybisexual@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is not good. This isn’t about “protecting the children” this is about control. This will hurt those who are most vulnerable. If it weren’t for the internet I probably would have died a while ago.

    Adults, take my warning, they will come for you next. Its a matter of time

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    And they expect that a 16-year-old won’t figure that out…

    I guess we’ll see what happens.

  • InevitableList@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d prefer for kids to learn to navigate social media whilst they have access to adult supervision and oversight. 16yos aren’t going to listen to their parents’ advice.

    • Chris Remington@beehaw.orgOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      16yos aren’t going to listen to their parents’ advice.

      That’s why I started and continued to talk to my two sons about it from a very young age (5 years old). Now they are teenagers and don’t have any online problems.

        • Chris Remington@beehaw.orgOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree. One of my sons doesn’t want to use social media (he tried several and didn’t like any of them). My other son only uses Reddit to find interesting things and information in niche subjects (he rarely interacts with anyone on the platform).

  • millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Whether this is good or terrible honestly kind of depends on how they define social media. Is discord social media? Are forums? Is Reddit?

    Arguably nobody really benefits from exposing children to feeds full of toxic and angry adults, but that doesn’t mean no communities should allow children. Like, there’s nothing wrong with kids dipping their toes into the Internet and learning and growing from it, but I don’t think it’s necessarily the best thing to just hand them the keys to the worst elements.

    Also like, I prefer adult communities over all age communities by a long shot.

  • finderscult@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Australia hopefully has their own home grown social media sites by now. Every other country that decides to wholesale ban all foreign social media tend to have replacements ready when they do it.

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Something the article doesn’t clarify is whether this is meant to only to apply to kids in Australia. Normally that would be obvious, except that Australia already has tried to demand social media companies remove content even for non-Australian users on the basis that Australians could bypass geo blocking with VPNs. If age checks are location/ IP based, they could make the same (bad) argument.