• BrooklynMan@lemmy.mlBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    i didn’t claim that. i quoted from an independant fact-checking source. take your disagreement to them.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Nothing you quoted from this “independent” source has anything to do with the content of the article. What you engaged in is known as ad hominem fallacy.

      • BrooklynMan@lemmy.mlBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        if the source is biased, logically, so would be its contents.

        but nobody is accusing you of thinking logically.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Every source is inherently biased, there is no such thing as an unbiased source. It’s incredible that grown ass adults don’t understand this. But nobody is accusing you of thinking logically.