• fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    13 days ago

    Of course they’d urge the continuation of the war, they have access to the Red Sea, and while not convenient, can get around the Hormuz lockdown. To them, aside from the acceptable sacrifice of their population a little, the war is beneficial. Oil prices are up, they’re sitting on oil, what’s not to like?

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 days ago

      Assuming human civilization lasts this long, in a hundred years they’re going to call this period the Resource Wars.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        A lot of wars are over resources. The Gulf War and Iraq War were fairly recent wars that were also specifically over oil on the middle east.

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            You can make an argument everything is economics, but I don’t think Trump got into this war for economic reasons (other actors may have, but not Trump)

            • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              Trump’s a useful idiot with motivations like “being near gold”, “not shitting himself”, and “getting away with fucking kids”. I guarantee the guys at raytheon, palantir, haliburton et al ran the numbers before they let him start dropping bombs