• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well that’s the thing I’m trying to say. It shouldn’t need to be enforced or checked (but yes, i support legislation) any more than putting pants on before going outside. But clearly, it’s fairly common behaviour to ignore basic rules.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 days ago

        It shouldn’t need to be enforced or checked any more than putting pants on before going outside.

        You get fined and put on a list if you go donaldducking around.

        Saying that is a bit like expecting politicians won’t be corrupt bcs of some decency & not because of consequences.

        We pay taxes to get such things sorted out for us, so we don’t have to assemble French street furniture every few years.

        (But I’m not exactly saying I know how to police dog gun safety habits.)

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I believe the government should have carte blanche to simply bypass constituonal rights that I deem inconvenient rather than following the established process to change them

        – bootlicking authoritarian idiots

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Not in the states at least. I assure you in real nations you will get at the very least a smack upside the head for this level of stupidity.