Keir Starmer has suggested the US is trying to interfere in British democracy after JD Vance, the US vice-president, blamed the murder of the British teenager Henry Nowak on mass migration.
The prime minister’s office responded after the senior Republican politician claimed in a post on X that Nowak would be alive “if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it”.
Downing Street did not name Vance directly but said its response to his comments was that “in recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets”.
Mass migration isn’t the problem, the problem is lack of oversight into what kind of people are coming into civilised countries, anyone that can so simply stab someone, lie to let them die shouldn’t have ever been allowed to come into the UK or any other country that has proper human rights against murder and rape, but these people aren’t educated and are incapable of integrating, so they shouldn’t be allowed entry.
Proper oversight is needed so people that are actually interested in a better life can be given that chance and those that seek chaos should stay home.
A) nice to see that you are concerned enough about Nowak’s death to respect his family’s wishes that it not be used to stoke division
B) Digwa is British
Take off your pith helmet, Rudyard, it’s not the 19th century any more. I’m surprised you didn’t refer to them as benighted savages. Probably your vocabulary doesn’t include the phrase.
Another expression that indicates you have nothing worthwhile to say.
If you’re referring to Sikhs, you’re wrong on both counts. Sikhs have high literacy, high educational and economic attainment, and Sikh communities outside Punjab are well-known for engaging constructively in civil society. Don’t let anecdata based on one fucked-up young man and his fucked-up family mislead you about the bigger picture.
🏆
I made you a trophy for the most dogwhistles in a single comment today.
So you agree that we should be processing the asylum requests and then coming to a decision as soon as possible rather than simply leaving everybody in a state of limbo in some random hotel?
As always, your racist take shows that you don’t actually know anything about the subject matter.
I’m currently working and living over 8 years in another country in a place that is about 1300 kilometres away from home so i’m kinda familiar with the whole process of moving to another country and making a life there but sure racism is what you got from my comment.
You literally said that the problem is a lack of oversight on the “kind of people” what kinds of people are you talking about? Are you talking about the habitual criminals that are easily detectable because of some physical trait? Maybe they have a particular style of facial hair, or a convenient “I am a gang member” tattoo, or perhaps it’s just the colour of their skin who knows.
You’re a racist, you might not think of yourself as a racist, but the way you choose to express yourself outs you as one.
More importantly though is the fact that you don’t appear to have picked up on the key point, which is that these asylum claims are not being processed. You are angry about something that is in fact not happening, these people aren’t been processed and let into the country despite being criminals, these people are not being processed yet are in the country anyway. If you want to solve the problem you actually have to solve the problem but the Conservatives decided to defund immigration precisely so they would be able to continue to have a group that they could hit with a big stick just to have something to keep the Gammons angry.
You are a racist piece of shit.
I’m currently working and living over 8 years in another country in a place that is about 1300 kilometres away from home so i’m kinda familiar with the whole process of moving to another country and making a life there but sure racism is what you got from my comment. And you are an ignorant twat.
Everyone here saw your comment for what it was. Go back to reddit
Hon, your dear Prince Andrew is in Epstein file.
Yeah but he just stabbed people with his cock and lied about it.
Also “hon” i’m not British and Epstein’s files still haven’t been fully released and there’s a good chance there is a cunt from your country in those files.
What has Prince Andrew to do with mass immigration? Never read such nonsense, but what else can I expect from leftist 🤷♂️AFAIK they never work, always the others have to pay, never take responsibility for their actions, it is always the others’ fault … they are lost cases.
Now you can downvote me into oblivion, because this is the only thing you can do 😂😂😂
What has immigration to do with one British person stabbing another. Seems even your complaining about non-sequitors is biased. What else can we expect from the right wing except selective outrage.
As you’re engaging in bad faith allow me to: what we should really be worried about is white on white violence. Knife crime in the UK isn’t all that bad, when you remove white gang activity, even more so when you remove men-on-men violence.
All of which to highlight, your position isn’t a serious one genuinely held. You don’t dislike non-sequitors, you engage in them. You disliked their argument, and it is convenient for you to say you don’t like non-sequitors in this moment. You aren’t serious. This culture war nonsense, the British right loves so much, is merely a distraction from the Epstein class robbing us blind.
What fantasy world you livin’ in? You’re talkin’ like you’ve never heard of chings, opps, or where them man come from.
I’m just making fun of the frequent cases of thought terminating double think among the British/global right.
I thought that was obvious, I highlighted the double think in this very thread, then went on to list a bunch more…
It’s a distraction from the Epstein class robbing us blind. We can tell because of the Panama papers, listen to Murdoch/Epstein in the titular files, they’ll tell you themselves. The British right aren’t serious people with a serious point to make, they’ll say what ever, when ever to justify their presupposed position, source: you.
You’re movin’ like you don’t know the roads at all. Bare white boys get used as fodder. Black gangs are the ones patternin’ the ends.
I’m sure you believe that. Anyway here’s the data: [https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingseptember2025#offences-involving-firearms].
Anyway, the most violent demographic in this country is men, men killing men all over the land. Regardless of colour or belief or wealth, it’s all men.
What do you want to do to men because they’re so violent. I’ve heard rumblings of deportation, do you want to deport all men, or is deportation not an effective measure for violence?
Or would you like to drop the nonsense and talk about how you’re being robbed blind by the wealthy elite funding your media.
Removed by mod
It was a suggestion that ethnic English people, even in the highest reaches of the establishment, are also capable of the most degraded forms of criminality. So why the focus on immigrants?
Do try to keep up.
You should probably sue your mother for poor quality workmanship when producing you, because I can’t imagine being so dull witted that you were unable to work that one out.
Given the fact that Andrew is demonstrably British, I would suggest that the nationality of someone doesn’t have much to do with their ability to be a criminal.
Also unless you are proposing to present us with a minority report style prediction system, I’m not exactly sure how anyone would have known that this particular individual was necessarily more a threat, than any other person from that nationality.
This is how your comment is read: Bla bla bla. My point on my previous comment? Never touched. I guess you did not pass school, which would not surprise me.