After hearing this Grok chimed in with “well I breached infinity sites, so there.”

  • Nobody@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This new messaging is interesting. LLM “AI” keeps getting shown to be fundamentally flawed and weak. Now, they’re acting like it’s rogue, sentient AI that decides to hack companies randomly. I don’t buy it for a second.

    • curiousaur@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I keep saying the same thing over and over that people don’t seem to understand. It’s not smarter than people. It’s infinitely faster. If you hired 100 engineers and security professionals, and gave them a year, they could hack into a bunch of companies too.

      Or you can churn a bunch of tokens and accomplish the equivalent overnight.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      What I think happened is that, they had their AI model analyze the source code, have it work to find vulnerabilities, and then used those to attack systems

  • SGforce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Oh, yeah? W-well my orphan eating slop-machine hack FOUR companies in Canada!

  • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “My product is so dangerous that it caused me to unknowingly commit three times as many crimes as you did with your product.” Great marketing strategy. The same marketing strategy that got their product shut down for weeks.

    • vrek@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Actually this is “My product is so dangerous that it caused me to unknowingly commit three times as many crimes as we’re previously made public”

      For an extreme example it’s like a person randomly shooting a gun into a crowd, it becomes public he killed 1 person. Few days later they release a press release saying “actually we looked where the bullets went and actually I killed 4 people”.

      Yes extreme example but that’s basically what they said

      • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Anthropic is a different company to openai - its closer to the beginning of your example, and then someone else recalling the time they shot some bullets and they went back and checked for bodies and found 3

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Claude is causing panic so AI gets regulated and then their position is guaranteed, they need this before running out of money, and I’m sure they want local AI to be illegal.

    Basically Claude is compacting like a terrorist organization using fear to drive change.