• [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This story, that Cloudflare reported lower identified automated bot and API traffic from the ASN of the destroyed data centres, has been so massively warped it’s insane.

    It demonstrates that average people and apparently tech reporters like toms hardware don’t know how the internet works at all.

    When residential proxies affect at least a third of US households, you don’t need to route through a data centre that will be flagged as bot traffic. You set up a wire guard config and route to a residential proxy installed on millions of smart TVs, android boxes, smart appliances, desktop computers, and phones.

    Seriously, I recently mapped multiple residential proxy networks with over 30 million unique US ips that were just scraping. You can use math to reliably fingerprint these networks, they’re big, with hundreds of millions of IPs involved, and you can rotate them via an API call to clean ones.

    Zero of this traffic would be taken down by these strikes. We didn’t even see any perceptible change in internet traffic overall with this.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      tech reporters like toms hardware don’t know how the internet works at all.

      I’m sure they just don’t care. The vast amount of modern “journalism” is just reposting someone else’s story. And if they get clicks, they don’t much particularly care if it’s accurate.

    • adr1an@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      A proxy only routes traffic while the cpu cycles are happening elsewhere, allegedly, the data center that went offline.

      Your argument only makes sense if those proxies are more than just routing network packets but also hosting the actual code of those bots. Oh, and you’d also need to assume there’s no c&c, the bots should be autonomous. Else there’s the single point of failure. If there’s a c&c then they can all go offline with a strike.

      • lacethespace@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Exactly. Those smart TVs can be used as proxy to get around IP bans, but they can’t run LLMs on their own to generate social media posts. They can’t coordinate DoS attacks, only play a part in them.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve blocked my cameras and TV from reaching the wider web.

      Is there a tool I can use to monitor my home network for this sort of thing?

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hmm. That seems to be the big gun. And something that will require analysis.

          I was hoping for something intended for just this purpose.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I would be looking at what tools opnsense provides. opnsense is a firewall operating system, its most effective to put it between your appliances and the internet. but some if its tools could also be used standalone