The card system would probably be best where just buy a card and load it up at a kiosk. There would still be potential security vulnerabilities if you were allow someone to "anonymously "view that transaction. Or allow someone to view the card trips. Which would just be logged with its number.

And I’m just more so talking about the current system they have in place. I’m not sure what else they could do utilizing their current system except for forcing some kind of account

A lot of people would argue the second saints row is a masterpiece. Iand saints row is definitely never been about the story

I mean sure they could probably display less information when you punch in that card number. But the biggest sticking point for this is I don’t see how they could create a secure system without forcing you to create an account? Which personally I think would be ridiculous.

The article and quiz talk specifically about these types of vectors for scams. If i assume they are all scams there is a zero % chance i get scanned in this way. Even on the two not a scams they talked about better alternatives to ensure their authenticity which i would have done as soon as i saw any of these “scams” its just a poorly written article that just assumes any wrong answers mean you are more likely to be scammed. I understand there is no way to 100% avoid being scams especially if you just out in the world but the answer from the article is dumb.

Edit: also the censored info made it impossible to tell if it was real.

That doesn’t make sense. Don’t trust Washington post either? Got it.

This quiz is dumb af. The two that weren’t scams didn’t give you enough info to identify if they aren’t and they both just as likely to be scams? And at the end they said it was still possible for me to get scammed even though I called every single item a scam. How am i gonna get scammed if i assume they are all scams?

Two things i love about accessibility. First more people get to play the games. and second it usually lets you turn off those stupid ass mini puzzles and quicktime events developers love so much for some reason.

As far as “voice actors” go. I personally think Keith David is objectively better. That’s not to say what lance Reddick did isn’t iconic and can never be replaced the same. But it’s a great choice to follow such a great act.

The difference is these days are negligible. And Firefox is even beaten Chrome in a few tests