You’re mixing the definitions of sideloading media and sideloading apps. Sideloading media follows your definition, e.g. transfer via another local device. Sideloading apps refers to the installing of apps outside of the (pre-)installed app store, e.g. by installing an APK directly.
It would indeed cause a rift between NATO. Which is why it’s unlikely that anyone would support an Israeli invasion of the Hague.
The Netherlands would invoke article 5 of NATO in that case. I don’t think such an action would end well at all.
You’re missing the part where Apple initially wanted to partner with Masimo and when they refused, decided to poach several employees from Masimo to develop the competing product.
Masimo seems to have a legitimate case here, and Apple is definitely in the wrong, as they knowingly attempted to copy Masimo’s product. The late publication of the patents could be due to literally anything, but it doesn’t seem to be done willfully to ‘trap’ Apple into this lawsuit. Because of that, I’d argue that this is a bit of a fault in the broken patent system, but that Masimo is not deliberately patent trolling here.
… carried out rapid manoeuvres and live firing at Western Europe’s largest firing range…
Bit rude to refer to Belgium that way, but not historically inaccurate I suppose.
Lost to Peter Thiel.
For the percentage the duration does not matter.
And it’s considerably more than WW1. In WW1, the percentage was 41%. For WW2, estimates differ a bit, varying from 60-67%.
The current Gaza-conflict percentage stands at 61%, and it appears to be rising.
I do see I have to rectify myself a bit. I saw a headline stating it was higher than all 20th century conflicts, but the article contained a line stating it was higher than the average of all 20th century conflicts (which is about 50%). Small but significant detail, mea culpa.
Regardless of that, it’s higher than WW1 by a huge margin and it’s about as high as WW2 (which had death camps that civilians were sent to). If the IDF has reached that level of civilian casualties, any claims that they do their best to avoid targeting civilians have been effectively debunked.
The Israel-Gaza conflict has a larger percentage of civilian deaths than any other 20th century conflict, as was researched by Israeli universities.
Because it seemed Dugin was the target of the operation I believe.
Those nuclear advances are what makes nuclear feasible under the new regulations. Those regulations that prohibit the older, less safe designs. But those old designs are also cheaper. It’s why the vast majority of the least safe reactors are in the former Soviet Union; they had to be built en masse, and it had to happen cheap.
Goverments around the world would still be building the cheap unsafe shit if it weren’t for nuclear scientists aggressively recommending stronger regulations. It’s also why it’s always politicians and other idiots who advocate removing those regulations, and not the nuclear scientists who actually know what they’re talking about.
Nuclear also isn’t slow to build just due to regulations. South Korea is an example, where they built plenty of reactors with build times of approximately 5 years each. They still have regulations and red tape, but they also heavily standardised their reactors and their manufacturing. But most western countries just want to build one or two or so, and that just means doing a lot of work that you can’t copy from anywhere.
Nuclear is best done in bulk and in collaboration with others. The EU could for example launch a nuclear initiative to build say 100 reactors all across Europe, which would allow us to take advantage of building at scale. But you’ll never convince anyone of that if you come at them with your unnecessarily hostile attitude. It’s people like you who chase people away from nuclear. You don’t bring any arguments, you demonstrate no knowledge of the subject at hand, just empty sentences and name-calling.
Convince, don’t insult.
Nuclear engineers are the same people who helped create these regulations…
Nuclear is really safe today, thanks to those regulations. We’ve changed and improved those power plants a lot in the past half century. I don’t consider safety a real issue anymore, but if we cut all red tape and regulations, then it does become an issue again. That’s nuclear engineers saying so by the way, not “ignorant fucks”.
Ever considered that that red tape exists for a reason? And that cutting it could have bad consequences?
How incredibly petulant and childish of Sunak to chicken out of this meeting. There were incredibly important subjects on the agenda, like the crisis in Gaza.
Absolutely disgraceful for the British.
He’s been in the game quite long, well before the current common brand of right-wing populism. He actually has plans he wants to execute, and he’s definitely going to try and do it.
Without it, things will get quite difficult. They’d have only 30 out of the 38 needed for a majority which would be very low, particularly without obvious partners who wouldn’t rather watch Wilders fail. It’s not required to become PM sure, but he’s going to have to do something if he wants to get anything actually passed.
A GL/PvdA-VVD-NSC-BBB combo has a majority in all chambers. It’s a difficult coalition, but the only one that seemingly commands a majority in both chambers.
Won’t get them a majority in the senate, with BBB they have 30 of the required 38 seats there.
Considering Argentina does not have enough dollars to actually pull that off, he has no real implementable policy.
Have you considered rational thought instead?
697? Geez that’s… Not great.