Thanks for that correction.

If you’re a us citizen, they cannot detain you indefinitely. What that means isn’t legally defined yet, but seems to be around 4 - 8 hours.

Edit: apparently no longer true.

Fine. Stop lending your voice to justifying war. It is evil, and won’t accomplish what you want. If you find your message being used to justify war, stop immediately.

To be clear, while this SHOULD be a moral argument, it isn’t. This, at this point, is a pure effectiveness argument. The second your voice is being used to justify war, you will not accomplish what you hope.

Using your voice to criticize to justify war doesn’t make the world a better place.

War ends up causing more oppression to minority and vulnerable groups than just about the absolute worst circumstances. Samantha powers doctrine, which you are espousing, made the world a much much worse place for the people she claimed to want too help. You’re doing the same.

You NOT lending your voice to these justifications of war crimes would make the world a better place.

It wasn’t random. It was a double-tap strike in a first strike package (generally the most well researched targets) that fucking Google maps knew was a girls school for years.

It was either a deliberate terror strike that intentionally killed a hundred and seventy or so girls between the ages of 9-12 or it was a level of incompetence that is indistinguishable from intentionality and should be treated as such.

Don’t justify this action even the slightest by trying to go ‘Whoops, teehee, just an accident’

Or if you want too host it on NFS backed storage

Nope but articles like this coming out in greater amounts right now are intentionally being pushed out as propaganda to make people feel okay with America committing terrorist bombing campaigns against civilian targets.

While the content is true, the article itself is explicitly propaganda to justify terrorism.

How about I support the side that was attacked first with massive terror bombing campaigns against civilian targets that responded with missile attacks that almost entirely focused on military targets.

Seriously. America started the war by double tapping a girls school intentionally. Almost 200 girls between 9-12 were murdered in that terrorist bombing attack.

And I use the word intentionally as even fucking Google maps knew it was a girls school. First strike packages are the most carefully researched and selected targets in any war.

You can also just blame autocorrect.

Even if the stock dips soon after the IPO, getting in early on a huge IPO such as this historically pays off huge in the long run.

Then why don’t they want to abide by the normal 12 month seasoning time period?

How do you feel about Nat Turner?

Or, let me guess, you have no consistent moral framework, and just feel whatever your leaders tell you to feel, right?

Why does Hezbollah exist again? What force drove the Shi’a of southern Lebanon to band together and create Hezbollah?

The answer to that question proves the lie of your statements.

Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were funded by the US AND China until the late 80’s

Don’t get me wrong, fuck Israel, but it is incorrect to say that Pol Pot wasn’t funded by the west.

Don’t use namecheap.

Super happy with PorkBun

No, but you can certainly judge people when they hold their Nazi forefathers up as their political inspiration, as Freeland has done repeatedly.

Grandfather was a Nazi - you don’t get judged for that.

Grandfather was a Nazi and you celebrate him politically - you absolutely get judged.

Nice try with attempting to tar critics of the person who celebrates her Nazi heritage as Nazi’s though.

I think you mean “of Nazi heritage”

The Nazi heritage of her grandfather, whom she celebrates as her political inspiration, outranks his Ukrainian heritage.

But, I guess I shouldn’t expect anything more of a country that gave a standing occasion to a living Nazi in the 2020’s.

Yes, a website without SSL is very likely a phishing attack, it means someone might be impersonating the real website and so it shouldn’t be trusted. Even if by a fluke of chance you hit the right site, all of your communication with it is unencrypted, so anyone in the path can see it clearly.

No, Google has hit me with this multiple times for sub domains where the subdomain is the name of the product and has a login page.

So, for example, if I have emby running at emby.domain.com they’ll mark it as a phishing site. You have to add your domain to their web console and dispute the finding which is probably automated. I’ve had to do this at least three times now.

All my certs were valid.

Goddammit.

Not just their scientists.

Look up operation bloodstone.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bloodstone

It looks like it did