New investors were covering existing loans you mean!
No Ponzi scheme here, nothing of the sort. Just good old economics!
But yes, they sold apartments and used the proceeds to finance existing, already sold buildings that weren’t built yet.
New investors were covering existing loans you mean!
No Ponzi scheme here, nothing of the sort. Just good old economics!
But yes, they sold apartments and used the proceeds to finance existing, already sold buildings that weren’t built yet.
Wouldn’t that lead to the same argument as originally brought against photography, though?
A photographer is effectively negotiating with the sun, the sky and everything else to hopefully get the result they are looking for on their device.
And that’s the reason why LLM generated content isn’t considered creative.
I do believe that the person using the device has a right to copyright the unique method they used to generate the content, but the content itself isn’t anything worth protecting.
So why is so much information (data) freely available on the internet? How do you expect a human artist to learn drawing, if not looking at tutorials and improving their skills through emulating what they see?
That’s what humans do, though. Maybe not probability directly, but we all know that some words should be put in a certain order. We still operate within standard norms that apply to aparte group of people. LLM’s just go about it in a different way, but they achieve the same general result. If I’m drawing a human, that means there’s a ‘hand’ here, and a ‘head’ there. ‘Head’ is a weird combination of pixels that mostly look like this, ‘hand’ looks kinda like that. All depends on how the model is structured, but tell me that’s not very similar to a simplified version of how humans operate.
That’s a political win situation, regardless. What’s 10 million lives if you can claim that you successfully did the work that even the great leader Mao couldn’t achieve 50 years before?
It’s also cheap. Shitty suicide drones can be made for less than 1000$, why bother wasting expensive materials that don’t improve success rates?
The M2 is slightly different in that it’s been actively kept in service (like the mg3 or the m3 Carl Gustav), which the Maxim hasn’t been (that I know of). Plenty of other old weapon systems have been, though.
Just as there’s apparently still thousands of new-in-box lend-lease M1928 submachine-guns in storage. I’d wager a lot of large countries have similar stockpiles, especially places like Russia that can absolutely afford to just dump shit in random places.
They actually introduced pretty much that exact thing back in 2008, the Order of Parental Glory. Have more children to fuel the machine, please
To some extent, it actually does go over well, sadly.
Not to worry, there’s a construction site next to me. I’m sure they wouldn’t miss just one small little spool
Almost everything you said, with the exception of AI CSAM and suicide prevention, can hardly be considered a serious issue.
What’s wrong with searching for how to make a bomb? If you have the wish to research it, you can probably make a bomb just by going to a public library and reading enough. The knowledge is out there anyway
I was under the impression that had been solved by third parties? Or is chip cloning not enough?
I mean, the NAND chips can be replaced fairly effectively if you know what you’re doing
Exactly. Then it’s fine. He had his chance, he didn’t take it. Fair game
I think in the eyes of the Government it makes a lot of sense to act the way they do, it’s a great casus belli that has been dropped into their lap to ‘finally’ wipe out Gaza.
Half-foreign. That’s enough to generate a higher interest in her compared to full ‘locals’
I mean, it’s the half-assed draft that was announced a long time back, but still, better than nothing
Shush. Welcome our AI overlords!