“after one attack” now that is thinking outside the box. I wonder why they build the iron dome.
“after one attack” now that is thinking outside the box. I wonder why they build the iron dome.
Lemmy in a nutshell. Mostly a very specific group of people.
It would skew it even more to rich people. Since… you know… everyone else has to work.
Ah so only rich people can ever be politicians as everyone else simply can’t afford it.
So instead of letting them free they murder them?
What the actual fuck are you talking about. Hamas murders people all the fucking time, posting videos of their brutal murders etc. proudly online. IDF has no interest in killing hostages, it does not help them, it can only backfire.
This is the report where you got that picture from. On page 44 are the assumptions for storage costs: 100 to 400 MWh of storage, assuming they are charged and discharged 315 times per year (so eg. 31’500 MWh storage output per year for 100 MWh capacity). Those do not need to be 100% cycles, but given that a year has hardly more days than 315 and some days even see no production, they need to be cycled pretty much every day the sun is shining. Anyway, what is my point? We need more than a few hours of storage to make it work. But the more storage you have, the less you actually use it, making it disproportionaly more expensive. Note what they say:
Lithium-ion batteries remain the most cost competitive short-term (i.e., 2 – 4-hour) storage technology
We need more than 2 or 4 hours. A single night is already far longer than that. The shorter the storage duration, the cheaper it is. Of course this skewes the numbers. It is like calculating the storage cost of nuclear waste for only 2 years. Of course it looks better.
Ah, thanks for that detailed reply, let me try: Nuclear is still a lot cheaper.
Okay and did you add all the extra cost to make that work? Like when talking about nuclear we do not just look at the reactor itself. For example you need lots of storage and distribution to make renewables work.
So even if we assume it is not economically viable… I would rather not have another few billion tons of CO2 just to save some money.
Why where the hostages surrounded by 120 civilians? At what point is a civilian not a civilian anymore? If he has hostages at home? Were there any non-civilians?
No shit, a sharp drop suddenly with a new test procedure… How could you even start to think it is anything but the test? Any why not run the 2 tests in parallel to actually make them comparable to begin with? Who are the idiots doing such things? Ask GPT how to do that next time, it can’t do worse than this.
So did he or not? They have cameras everywhere, right? Guilty people plea for whatever all the time, how is this even news given the little information?
It says 2 hours ago, but haven’t I read this here yesterday?
What the actual fuck? They are all going to lose their job, right…?
Not all of them made it to their destination. What a massive success for Ukraine.
How do you know the person you tell about the bus stop used that information for an attack instead of… I don’t know what people do at bus stops normally, but that.
This is a reduction from a all time high last year and much was replaced with LNG. So not exactly good news.
30x30 km area, nice. It will force Russia to react and create issues with conscripts being on the front.
How can a news agency have that kind of power?