I live there
I live there
San Francisco is not actually clothing optional. Full nudity is mostly illegal. You have to cover the genitals
What does that mean? You want them to just throw out data that they don’t like?
They’re not barred. They simply can’t compete. What is the competition that having a vagina at birth? What’s the competition? What are the rules?
Or is it arbitrary barring of people from spaces based on characteristics that have absolutely nothing to do with ability.
But to answer your question, here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Gisborne_Gordon
People missing limbs are not barred from sports. Wtf are you talking about
There’s no such thing as biological gender
You know just enough to do it the wrong way apparently
For anyone reading this, please don’t follow this advice. It’s terrible and basically security through obscurity
Any media that depicts children as sexual is promoting pedophilia
What a terrible take. The same way that violent video games promote violence and is harmful to children?
Children are not sexual
No children are involved
Catering to their fantasies emboldens them to act.
There is 0 evidence of this, and some evidence to the contrary. Having an outlet that involves 0 victims is beneficial. But even still, there are people that are into this that have 0 interest in actual children. Because it’s just a fantasy, the same way that people have rape fantasies.
Yes, sexualizing real children’s bodies is wrong. Sexualizing 3d images of fantasy things is always OK because it’s not real
By the way, just because these are digital renderings does not mean that there is no harm. Seeing such content can still be harmful to past victims.
This is true of literally everyone and any one. Anyone can be victimized by anything and be traumatized by seeing it. That’s not a reasonable argument to throw around accusations of child abuse.
They specifically called it “child abuse content”, not “child abuse”. This seems perfectly valid, no?
No, this is not valid. MAYBE if they added “fictional child abuse content” or something, but even that would be misleading. There’s no child, so it can’t be child abuse, and thus can’t be child abuse content.
It also normalizes pedophilia
No it doesn’t. Only in the same way that violent video games or bdsm normalize actual violence.
Calling this child abuse is what’s fucking disgusting. This is adults role playing with fucking digital renderings. Literally no children involved. Go clutch pearls elsewhere
What does this even mean? What do you propose?
What’s bad about it? It’s the only way to use an ad blocker on mobile
I don’t doubt that. But that’s also true of hotels
I’ve never had a bad experience
Calling those words racist is absurd. Especially slave and master. It’s literally the function of the device.
Disgusting
Lol dangerous?