The problem is that while docker is running as root (0) the searxng process internally runs as a user searxng with id 977

So your filesystem outside of docker needs to have those files assigned the right ownership.

This thread has a more detailed discussion that you might find helpful. https://forums.truenas.com/t/how-to-install-searxng-app-docker-permissions-issue/14049/10

Yep Probably you need to change ownership and/or permissions of the files outside of docker.

I dont want to give the wrong suggestion from memory so hopefully thats enough info to get you going in the direction of a fix. Basically see what user id owns the files inside of docker, make it the same uid outside of docker in the folder you are bind mounting.

If you have permissions then try editibg uwsgi.ini and see if it lets you save.

Im going from memory but i think i had a similar issue and i had to manually create the file, yours shows the file already exists but it might not be writable.

try opening a shell with ’ docker exec -it searxng sh" and see if you can cat the file from inside docker, if yes then I’m not sure of a solution ,if no then the problem is with permissions on your filesystem outside of docker where you have " - ./data/searxng:/etc/searxng" You need to go to ./data/searxng and correct the permissions so they can be read inside the docker.

open(“/etc/searxng/uwsgi.ini”): Permission denied [core/io.c line 525]

I think here is your problem. Make sure that file exists and is readable from inside of the docker.

deleted by creator

Given the switch is exploitable at the hardware level, i doubt there is anything nintendo can do beyond not allowing use of their online services.

They said a similar thing about 3ds cfw, yet we dont see any reports of it actually happening.

It doesnt sound very anonymous. If the info is “visable to authorities” then its not very private.

Paypal and most other services already allow for payments to be “private” but visable to authorities.

People who actually want private and anoymous payments already use crypto.

Wow that sounds like a terrible product no one would want, who is the target audience for such a thing?

Please stop with this false claim torrenting requires port forwading, it doesnt, this has been debunked many times.

Point is you are setting yourself up for disappointment in the future.

Like you see this constant cycle of software becoming wosre as the companies want more and more money and your response is just “yeah but it wont affect my use case so i dont care”

Yeah im sure when it comes to plex, the app based off making pirates into paying customers, it wont fall victim to the same thing.

Gee leopards seem to be getting awful fat lately.

Im talking about all of plexs infrastructure, the hosting for the app, providing tunnels for users without port fwding, maintaining user accounts and usage data, emails… A lot goes into running a service like plex besides just “auth and verification”…and thats not even including the staff required to maintain it and developers to keep all the apps updated.

It will be if you depend on plex for streaming

How mamy months of server costs do you think those lifetime passes cover? If everyone just paid once for a lifetime then plex as a service could no longer function.

Yeah exactly so nothing i mentioned was actually rolling anything back, trans people never had equality, women never had equality, minorities do not have equality. You will never have equality under a capitalist system unless you have the $$$ and lawyers to backup your demands for it,.

But please keep being loud about how everyone who disagrees with you is trying to take away your rights (the ones you never had to begin with) and making up strawmen to argue with so you don’t have to address anything in reality. I’m sure you’ll make progress any day now with that attitude.

Just to correct the record:

I’m not in favor of excluding trans people from sports. That said, I also recognize that access to sports especially at a competitive level isn’t a guaranteed right, and has always been limited to the relatively privileged.

As for bathrooms, I believe all public restrooms should be either gender-neutral or single-occupancy to better ensure safety, privacy, and inclusion for everyone.

You keep putting words in my mouth, at what point did i suggest rolling back rights for anyone?

It seems like you are just looking to be offended, good luck with that, ill leave you to your strawmen.

when I offered examples earlier, I wasn’t endorsing those views I was referencing arguments I’ve heard others make. Sharing an example doesn’t mean I personally support it, any more than mentioning a conspiracy theory means I believe in it.

When I mentioned “women’s safety,” I was reflecting how some cis women frame their concerns not my own view. Many of them aren’t transphobic, but simply misinformed or exposed to fear-based narratives, often through social media and sensationalist news. That’s part of why I left platforms like Facebook it was full of that kind of rhetoric even in unrelated spaces.

I absolutely understand if some people don’t want to engage with those views. But I do believe there’s value in having allies who are willing to engage in good faith, challenge misconceptions, and bring people closer to understanding and empathy especially in a climate where trans rights (and many others) are under attack.

This isn’t about compromising trans safety or dignity. It’s about strategy and outreach—about trying to build broader coalitions and prevent further regression. We may not change everyone’s mind, but we can still work to prevent them from siding with those who want to strip rights away entirely. In that, we’re all on the same side.

Just to be clear AGAIN I’m not suggesting trans people should give anything up, nor that seeking equality is “too much.” That’s a misrepresentation of what I said. My original point was observational, not prescriptive. I was commenting on how polarized discourse has become, especially compared to previous civil rights movements, like the fight for gay rights in the 90s and 2000s.

I’m not arguing against pushing for rights or progress. On the contrary, I support continuing that fight wholeheartedly. My concern is about how infighting and rigid framing can stall progress and alienate allies. That’s the issue I was trying to highlight.

Just to clarify, I’m not disagreeing with you. My concern is about how certain approaches on all sides of complex issues can unintentionally lead to greater pushback. I’m not saying people shouldn’t push back at all, but rather that the “all or nothing” mentality often shuts down meaningful dialogue and hinders progress.

My original point was an observation, not a prescription. I’m reflecting on how discourse today feels more polarized compared to the more incremental, dialogue-driven progress we saw during earlier movements like gay rights 20–30 years ago or civil rights 50–60 years ago.