Extorting and profiting from private information is not sexist. Pretending that it is something that happens to women because they are women, that it doesn’t happen to men, or that only men do it, is sexist.
Extorting and profiting from private information is not sexist. Pretending that it is something that happens to women because they are women, that it doesn’t happen to men, or that only men do it, is sexist.
They are against things like mandatory military service for men only, women-only universities, women’s quotas, and other things that create a noticeable disadvantage in their daily lives, in one of the most ultra-capitalist societies in the world.
You know, against things that are effective gender discrimination and that feminism advocates. But yeah, their reaction and rise can only be explained by them being terrible men, no doubt.
Wow, so many hoaxes and bullshit for such a short comment.
That seems quite reasonable. Even leaving aside the propaganda, they cannot recognize what they have lost if they do not remember it.
Moreover, in the case of female mutilation, it is also mostly approved and advocated by women.
too killed women and children
Frequently this shit is said I always wonder, are women equivalent to children, is it okay to kill men, or both?
It would be ideal, but this is not something that can be solved with votes and protests. If I were in their shoes, I certainly wouldn’t be the brave one who would give his life to rebel against tyranny.
It’s not their responsibility either, they just had the bad luck to be born there.
They didn’t kick out that minority who ran racist businesses, they kicked out all the 288k people who reneged on their “duty” to go kill ukrainians and die for putin’s aspirations.
Don’t misinterpret this as a slight to the main topic, but I am unable to imagine 110 people living together in one house.
I wonder how many of them (for both sides) were involuntarily recruited.
Yep, I guess the covid made it a visceral, identitarian issue. They’re not good allies, but hey, if they have to be alienated, it’s a reassurance that they’re on the right side.
If you manage to argue long and hard with those crazy extremists (not with the ignorant ones) and not lose your temper, you should be sanctified 😅
Being confrontational will only alienate them from your position and be counterproductive for everyone. Better to just share info that is simple and friendly enough; my favorite is this video: Kurzgesagt: The Side Effects of Vaccines - How High is the Risk?
Only against women and girls, sexual violence against men and boys they do not want to address. But maybe they shouldn’t be so suspicious, maybe there isn’t a single case or fear that it could happen.
That must be it. The same people who raised the alarm that women are the main victims in ukraine and put the spotlight on sexual violence against women, using the same reports that said ukrainian men suffered it twice as much, can’t be sexist manipulators.
But anyway, at least they seem to care about half the population…too bad they did nothing until now when those same women were being bombed indiscriminately.
If those data were minimally credible, we would still be talking about 2/3 civilian casualties, about ~10k children killed instead of ~15k. Your context doesn’t change the tone, it’s still genocide, indiscriminate massacres, endless war crimes, etc.
It is certainly very early, but how long will we have to wait to evaluate their success or failure? Or will it be the typical “just one more term”?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Nothing, and that’s fine. I don’t know if it’s because of fanaticism with the topic or what, but it seems strange to me that people get upset about this.
But to try to clarify it better, the other user says that self-determination is one of the values of europe (to fight for), hence my comment.
I am addressing the journalist’s claims (starting even in the subhead), which is pertinent. If sexists don’t like it and are looking for excuses, that’s their problem.