I think the best way would be to prevent it from being sold in the first place.
I think the best way would be to prevent it from being sold in the first place.
Yes, I know about prohibition. It always gets brought up. It would be interesting to see how a ban on vapes/cigs today plays out how prohibition did back then. What lengths would people go to to get their nicotine fix? Or would most people just think it’s not worth the time and give it up? Would growing your own tobacco for personal use but a ban of commercial sale mean that only the very dedicated would smoke? I lot of interesting things to consider and thank about.
Enforcement costs money and time which it seems nobody has. A complete ban would be cheaper and easier. I don’t even know how you could enforce it. If someone buys a vape that is legal age and gives it to a kid, you can’t stop that. I don’t have an opinion either way as I quit smoking years ago.
No worse than Ukraine constantly begging the USA for stuff.
Dude is just upset he lost his expensive earbuds.
I can say that it will never happen because I am in control of my own action. That question makes no sense. Anyway, it’s clear you are biased so what you say doesn’t mean anything until you can reasonably defend your position which you have yet to do.
Most dogs don’t attack people but what happens when they do? What would happen if your dog attacked you or someone else at random? Would you feel responsible? You can’t say that it will never happen because you can’t know that and also it’s what everybody says until it does.
I’m not sure where you’re going with your last statement but it’s irrelevant. We aren’t talking about people here.
OK, but you can’t train a dog to not attack a person correct?
I’m curious why you feel so strongly on this situation. Like genuinely, I want to know your side. Your reasoning.
Or, you know, take a photo of someone actually doing the thing you’re reporting on. Or maybe not use a tool that isn’t used in phone repair at all.
We know what it is. Nobody actually thinks that she is repairing a device in this photo. If a journalist is going to stage a photo, they should at least aim for accuracy.
Applying a soldering gun to a phone like that is not going to fix it.
Saying women=women would be an accurate statement.
It is unfortunate that people are being attacked for asking questions. It is very toxic here.
I know what they are trying to say, I just don’t think they realize that mathematically it doesn’t make sense.
I don’t mean to be a pedant but that math doesn’t make much sense.
I must be confused about what an equal sign means then.
That is some fancy mental gymnastics you came up with there. My comment before has absolutely nothing to do with this article. The fact that you went through my comment history to find a marginal strawman just goes to show you are trying to be argumentative. You can disagree with me all you want, it doesn’t mean you’re correct. In fact, nobody’s opinion can be correct.
They didn’t check this beforehand?