It was a non binding referendum, they had no reason to give a shit. They still voted for the fuckwits that enforced the non-binding resolution and made it law.

You get what you vote for.

It’s also why politicians love non-voters, one less moron you have to convince.

It’s never really been conservatism, it’s regressivism. They want Feudalism because they think they can be king.

You’re the problematic stuff and we’re calling you out.

You’re the only person concerned about race here. Stop being racist.

People act like the Afghani army that the US spent years trying to rebuild didn’t just up and run away.

Talk is cheap.

Labels without gravitas mean nothing. You call him a murderer, I call him a free man, I’ll let you guess which has more weight.

Yeah, but they didn’t have time for that in this election cycle. Fuck I hate it when progressives play the conservative handbook, follow fuck ups become fuck ups.

Went for a slam dunk but didn’t tie their laces.

That’s why access to quality education is tantamount to functioning democracy.

Sorry mate, this is basically a misunderstanding of the process.

That’s exactly my point. Can’t expect a democratic population to vote on a lack of information.

American politics are all right wing compared to other socially democratic countries.

Our major political parties are the Australian Labor Party (progressive/socialist), Liberal Party of Australia (capitalist/liberal), The Greens (environmental/progressive), National Party of Australia(authoritarian/regressives).

The Liberals and the Nats have a coalition called the Liberal National Party (LNP) because it’s the only way they can get enough representation to get majority government.

Greens typically vote along Labor lines.

The result - keep the status quo.

I feel like the result was different from my perspective.

The result - stop planless virtue signalling and prevent the government sweeping the real issue under the rug with a token gesture.

I don’t give a shit which side of history you want to fall on, no democratic society can be expected to make a cognizant decision without knowledge. I want for our Aboriginal people’s to have as much support as they deserve, however making a constitutional change before you write the plan is fucking ignorant.

I might vote Labor, but I don’t support aggrivated ignorance, lack of conviction, and poorly thought out attempts at virtue signalling without putting any real weight behind it. If you want to act like you’re want to make a change, prove it by coming up with a plan before you choose to start the plan. I want to see real change for our Aboriginal ancestors, not sweeping the real issue under the rug with a token gesture.

I’ve got a better idea than the voice, liquidate the Australian billionaires who raped our country for it’s resources for profit and give those proceeds to groups dedicated to improving indigenous people’s situation, and even that is a more cohesive plan than what was put forward.

Of course it’s not up for debate, but the other poster won’t say that because it goes against their argument about Israel not creating Hamas.

Let’s see how many sides there are to your face. Do you blame the US for ISIS?

Edit: The number of people down voting an exploratory question attempting to engage in conversation is the pinnacle of evidence as to what is wrong with this world. Viva la ignorance.

deleted by creator

Then spend less time in your own head.