The CEO of a company having a fiduciary obligation to the board and a lawyer to defend their client the best they can aren’t “actual laws” where a cop will arrest you. They are rules for the job and if you are not following these rules then you will be fired/lose your license to practice law.
That’s probably why there is no law that people point out to you. It’s a job requirement.
Well it’s not southern Russia’s northern China’s fault that some mad man in Moscow used a nuke. China will just be generous and help lead the clean up in wonderful north north China.
Exactly. Rome had memes they painted on the city walls about their political leaders.
I think it’s more like, the ship wreck will be recovered by someone. It is up to them to label these people as “illegal looters/pirates” or legitimate recovery which they will do business with.
If they go the “it’s illegal” route then they won’t see the loot for some time, while it gets sold on the black market.
Hah, you got me. The CIA infiltrated Lemmy.
We talk politics and current events sometimes. People also like coming by the office to let off steam about work. The time I brought it up was after that Mormon family got shot up by the cartels. I think the victims were in 2 different vehicles and the cartels stopped them and killed everyone.
We have interesting conversations.
I tell people at work, the way to fix the cartel problem is to legitimize cartels. You have to appeal to the fact that people want to leave things better for future generations. Change their AOR as a business to something else. They already diversified to some legal fields. The cartels already have the logistics, communication, and infrastructure.
An organization this big doesn’t disappear just because you captured the top guy. Someone will take over. That someone will usually be deadly so that they can cement their leadership.
If you convince the top guy to restructure his organization then after a few generations maybe they can have a ‘me too’ movement. No one likes my idea though, so I don’t know if that means it’s a good negotiation deal or a bad one. 😂
If you take her ID/passport, access to phones/internet, and any access to money so she would be reliant on you for survival.
Normally if she is your lover, you could just talk to each other though.
SMB 3 was a big deal when it came out. Not only was the game a delight to play, but they had a whole ass movie where they “debuted” the game at the end of it. The whole movie was pretty much a long Nintendo commercial showing different games and the power glove and all. The end was a video game competition and SMB 3 was the surprise game. They even showed where to get the first warp whistle.
I liked that movie.
I’m not adding anything new, but I wanted to agree with others saying playing in bursts is fine. I would suggest at least 1 hour, if not more. If you don’t have an hour just wait till you do. I played it in burst, but there is so much to read that a shorter amount of time won’t do it justice.
Definitely worth playing. Multiple times too. I played my first go one way and now I’m playing a completely different Tequila Sunrise.
If she retired earlier, then Mitch would have just blocked her replacement. Unless you mean like early early, like Obama’s first term. I don’t really remember hearing calls for her to resign until after Mitch showed his plan as ”the party of no."
I assumed the dude was trafficking from somewhere in South America. He had a plane and liked to fly low because he didn’t have his paperwork up to date.
Not sure why it’s surprising to you. It makes very much sense to me.
And if I say that I don’t believe you unless you post the schematics or technical manual for it?
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
Not saying he’s a saint or whatever, but he was working in the right direction and people’s views change over time.
I always assumed the no BC was because the church wants more members to grow up and hopefully tithe more. Either way the results being what they are and the church not using their position to inform and care for their people is a valid complaint.
Did you look up what charges he got or are you just assuming? (Probably rightfully, but still)
Just looked it up…they did charge him, but he pulled an Epstein.
I read he was a refugee. Small distinction, but it means he was escaping some sort of persecution which is why he was giving that status instead of immigrant. I would imagine he has strong feelings regarding based on his experience.
For current news, those were hard questions. I think just not accepting what the candidate says as facts and following up with detailed questions equals “hard questions” now.
Look how the news is treating Trumps mental decline compared to when his opponent was Biden.