Yes, but none of that applies to a South African born in South Africa to South African parents.
Sapient liberation now.
Yes, but none of that applies to a South African born in South Africa to South African parents.
As someone who has extensive personal experience with severe mental illness, I appreciate very much your desire to defend us (your instinct would usually be right), but psychopathy is a weird one. If the previous commenter had said “mental illness” instead of psychopathy specifically, I’d be pissed. But there is evidence that psychopaths advance in business management. I realize it’s not exactly JAMA, but here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephaniesarkis/2019/10/27/senior-executives-are-more-likely-to-be-psychopaths/?sh=24aa505d47c4
Modern US conservative policy isn’t a complex question. The answer is always money or sadism.
I don’t want to do-over the Civil War.
Some search engines and social media platforms make at least half-assed efforts to prevent or add warnings to this stuff, because anorexia in particular has a very high mortality rate, and age of onset tends to be young. The people advocating AI models be altered to prevent this say the same about other tech. It’s not techphobia to want to try to reduce the chances of teenagers developing what is often a terminal illness, and AI programmers have the same responsibility on that as everyone else,
Kind of pathetic that it’s the first big one, given our economic structure and the fact that we’re nearly a quarter into the century.
They’re rich, but it also makes them stand out, gets them extra headlines.
What are they afraid of? Country matters? Nothing?
Yeah. Not being legally required to abandon principles in favor of short-term profits for shareholders is tight.
“Data” is a mighty broad category to be “driving” anything.
Basic rights for people who aren’t white dudes were mostly imposed by court order. That’s the reality. We have laws, it’s just that those laws were written at a time when personhood didn’t really apply to anyone who wasn’t a white man. And if no one who you consider a full person is capable of being pregnant, you’re not going to think to put in a right to abortion explicitly, even if it’s a basic requirement for equal citizenship for the female sex, because women (and trans people) aren’t really people…and so on.
Edit: I realize this is mostly due to the weird semi-religious fervor Americans have for our Constitution and government system.
TL; DR: We’re running Modern Democracy 1.0 with a Frankenstein covering of patches, while other countries just upgrade whenever they need you.
Also, there’s not a large, well-funded far-left movement in the US fighting to radicalize people.
People hate exercise, too. Not doing it will shorten their lives, but they hate it.
Child sexual abuse
They can open a pdf, or their Legislative Assistants can. That stuff is performative, making sure we don’t expect them to regulate huge corporations because they’re so incompetent. This is the stuff they’re interested in regulating, so they do.
The key is defining terms like “false” and “violent.”
Let’s not mince words. Pro-gestational slavery.
Watch 2 minutes of her speaking, you’ll understand. She’s a GrandKaren.
The left doesn’t have the money to prop up a decent counterpropaganda apparatus.