Wait up, I just checked and you’re technically right - PTFE is definitely a PFAS. Dunno if it’s dangerous or frequently breaks down into dangerous PFAS, but FWIW I’ve long suspected that nonstick pans can’t be good for you. I’ve never seen a nonstick pan that doesn’t have a single scratch in anyone’s kitchen before.
You could probably stand to improve the clarity of your arguments though haha
People like you fucking disgust me. Either you’re willfully ignorant or maliciously so. Both are equally pathetic.
Not gonna get very far talking to people like that. Lucky for you I empathize with your intentions,
You haven’t shown the half-life of PTFE lol
Does the Constitution apply to foreign companies? I thought it doesn’t even apply to non-residents that are not on U.S. soil.
The legality of foreign ownership should absolutely be bilateral. I don’t get why this wasn’t the policy from the start.
So who will be Napoleon this time?
gas prices are still at “I DID THIS” sticker stupidity levels
Gas fell below $3 again…
Good thing the IDF refused to use rape kits when the entire world was calling for them to do so right after Oct 7.
Proof?
Good thing the IDF refused to use rape kits when the entire world was calling for them to do so right after Oct 7.
Proof?
I literally just quoted the article. Which side are you on? Is Western media trustworthy or not???
we only started sending untrained conscripts with one rifle per two men as a joke!
Ha, yeah, it’s wild that that’s happening. I don’t expect the last two thirds to be… competent, or well-equipped, FWIW.
Every Russian bot says that though, but then they start saying ‘oh actually Western media is all lies and glorious Russia is totally winning the war!’
Lucky for you, I don’t believe that either.
Let me guess, it actually says that Russia is totally winning and actually not getting humiliated by Ukraine?
No, it doesn’t; Russia is getting humiliated by Ukraine. But it also says they’ve expended only about 1/3 of their armed forces:
Of the 360,000 troops that made up Russia’s pre-invasion ground force, including contract and conscript personnel, Russia has lost 315,000 on the battlefield, according to the assessment. 2,200 of 3,500 tanks have been lost, according to the assessment. 4,400 of 13,600 infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers have also been destroyed, a 32 percent loss rate.
Before the invasion, Russia had a total standing military of approximately 900,000 active-duty troops, including ground troops, airborne troops, special operations and other uniformed personnel, according to the CIA. Since the start of the invasion, Russia has announced plans to increase the size of the armed forces to 1.5 million. The Russian Ministry of Defense has announced several rounds of conscription, including its regular fall conscription cycle on October 1.
You’re starting to sound like a Russian bot…
Well, considering that I very much support U.S. aid for Ukraine, I think I would be a pretty bad one.
Edit:
What about this story that says Russia has lost 87 percent of its troops?
That’s not what the article says, silly goose
That sounds like a Kremlin talking point
Really? Because it seems like Russia would be more incentivized to have westerners believe that Ukraine will be just fine without U.S. aid.
There’s a reason they’ve been fighting with shovels and rocks since then.
You know that’s not literally true right? Otherwise Ukrainian casualties would be in the single digits…
Is it possible you could spell out exactly what you think the U.S. and Ukraine should do? I genuinely cannot tell what point you’re trying to make here.
I remember Russia having issues sourcing munitions some time ago, yes. What is your point exactly? That Russia doesn’t have munitions??? They clearly do…
You do realize that the U.S. hasn’t spent an excess dollar on the Ukraine war, right? The budget was $700-some-odd billion whether that goes to shipping or storage costs.
No, Ukraine had munitions reserves. Which are, y’know, an expendable resource. And they expended them.
It kinda sounds like they are people living in their homes lol
I don’t see why I should care where they live so long as they’re actually living in the place. They obviously need a place to stay, shouldn’t be forced into renting, and I don’t know what would be accomplished by putting a cap on how nice of a place they can buy.
Edit:
Students Own Over $57M Worth Of Ritzy Vancouver Real Estate
$57M? So what, like 100 apartments, max?
Edit 2:
The least expensive home was $1.85 million, while the priciest came in at $31.1 million.
Oh okay so like 5 lol
Ah yes, the true cause of the preposterous housing market… college students.
Yes it is, it’s attacking the source for being Chinese.
No, it’s attacking the source for being integral to propaganda arm of the CCP. I’d hope to see the same response to state-run media of any non-democratic country. It’s also not intending to discredit the news whatsoever, so it isn’t an ad hominem attack. They’re encouraging you to use more trustworthy sources.
Suddenly the news is more real because a western source reports on it?
No, this news is real regardless. There’s probably a post about it on 4chan; that doesn’t make 4chan a news source, either.
Ironically people will think they’re immune to propaganda because they’ve been trained to automatically distrust non-western sources.
There are countless well-trusted sources outside of the western world. They just don’t require a stamp of approval from their authoritarian government before they can publish.
I’m shocked that this needs a /s, wow