No, it’s licence violates, well, pretty much the entire open source definition
No, it’s licence violates, well, pretty much the entire open source definition
Most open source projects rely on volunteers, and few technical writers volunteer.
Privacy is part of the reason I got back into film photography, my photos can’t be spied on if they never touch a computer.
Honestly surprised, i thought blu-ray m-disc was moderately popular
Seems to just be hosting issues https://www.reddit.com/r/Funkwhale/comments/1dlrsqn/funkwhaleaudio_down/
Funkwhale?
Frankly, I doubt he said anything worth listening to.
Mozilla is notoriously pro censorship, they blocked dissenter a while ago.
Yeah, after that I’m not really interested in what the grifter thinks.
I’m surprised it lasted this long. It was always kinda just a marketing gimmick for broadcom that got out of hand.
Apple puts a DRM chip in their peripherals, the fault for this happening is mostly on them.
I don’t see how that makes sense as a statement, an ai with access to a 56k modem can send a fax. It feels like they’re just using ai as a buzzword.
I’ve long thought that if politicians want to see our whatsapp messages, all politicians’ whatsapp messages should be published publicly.
How is he controversial? the only negative thing I’ve seen about FUTO is the proprietary license grayjay is under.
the large ecosystem of commercial crap which has tainted by association the open source core of it
Isn’t the main shop plugin (woocommerce) heavily infested with that though?
the tl;dr is: he asked nicely for the source code and they gave it to him?
It’s a shame they don’t embrace federation and open source more, the drama it would create would be fun at least.
I don’t think you can simply say something tantamount to “I think you’re an evil person btw pls don’t reply” then act the victim because they replied.
If the CEO had been sending multiple e-mails etc, I would agree with you that it’s harassment, but from what I can see at any point the blogger could have just disengaged, but he seemed more interested in getting the last word in.
I agree, both of them seem like a bit of a dick.
Although the blogger doesn’t appear to be a journalist, so things like “right to reply” doesn’t legally apply, it still seems like like basic good manners to offer that to someone if you write a hit piece on them. The comment section on blogs were traditionally a good tool for that, but the blogger seems to decided to not have one on his site.
Shrinkflation strikes again
Removed by mod