Jojo

FSM?

Apparently she defended trans people in a conversation, someone complained, and moderators got involved and manually overrode the ai. Paraphrased hearsay.

I mean personally I figure some way that doesn’t exclude anyone who’s had a hysterectomy, but

Everyone hear that? Once you get a hysterectomy, you’re not female any more!

Listen, mate, threatening to kill people is a pretty shit way to interact with anyone. If you don’t want to date someone with a penis, maybe say so up front. No one is trying to trick you, and no one is trying to lie to you. They’re just trying to live life, same as anyone.

When you define a word loosely enough, it can cease to be meaningful. When most people hear “opposition to censorship,” they’re not going to expect the reference to be advocating for the legalization of public and deliberate slander or open threats of violence and attempts to incite violence.

Using the phrase in that way may not be technically incorrect, but it is still misleading at best and disingenuous at worst. Again, you are welcome to your view of what constitutes censorship and the belief that it is always, ipso facto, abhorrent, but I don’t think that view leaves any room for meaningful discussion about this case, so I don’t think I’ll be engaging any further. Call it self-censorship if you like.

We’re also monkeys, if there is such a thing. Some monkeys are more closely related to apes (and thus to us) than they are to other monkeys, so if there’s any group that can be called the “monkey clade,” we are in it.

I guess you’re welcome to that opinion. Just as one would be welcome to the opinion that literally stalking someone should be legal.

Many kinds of speech are very broadly considered okay to restrict, even in places like the USA where “unlimited free speech” is a big motto. It’s illegal to slander and libel people, for example. That it’s illegal in many cases to verbally harass and abuse as well should be fairly non-contentious.

Yes. “Fighting words,” credible threats, and other such aggressive language are generally illegal, even in the USA.

If any language being illegal is automatically censorship, then I don’t think censorship isnecessarily bad in every case.

New Geneva conventions list of war crimes:

1. Wars

It is, nonetheless, not without problems. First complaint I usually hear is “wait times” but, when was the last time you needed something major and didn’t have to wait? Most places with socialized healthcare don’t have obscene wait times, they just have regular ones.

I mean yeah, let’s just do a universal healthcare, maybe. There are problems sometimes, but have you seen how it’s going without it?

69 inchemeters.

So, are you a stoned emo man, or a stone demoman, or what?

The second rule of tautology club is also a rule.

Hey man, whatever puts more meat in the grinder.

There’s defense, and there’s defenestration.

So, like, “holiday travel season”? Must be pretty significant if it’s newsworthy

Someone once asked (I think) Ruth Bader Ginsburg how many women had to be on the SCOTUS in order for it to not be biased towards men. Her answer was “All nine of them. After all, it’s been all nine men before and no one thought that was special”

I am, of course, quite heavily paraphrasing.

I mean apparently from the post text a mudik is an exodus and the other words are a place name? Seems sus.