Occupying a country that size doesn’t take a mere week. So no, it won’t.
Occupying a country that size doesn’t take a mere week. So no, it won’t.
You’re one link click away from understanding why your message is stupid. Question is whether it’s message alone.
It’s called Russia Law because it’s literally a Russian law copied verbatim
Sounds a lot like US House of Representatives, but in this case I don’t see why not.
There are no frozen conflicts with Russia.
Agreed, we shouldn’t build our plans out of assumption that Putin won’t use nukes offensively if appeased enough.
Not just Ukrainians. Uyghurs, Syrians, Kurds, Georgians, Quirimli, Chechens… the list goes fucking on.
The most vile shit they introduced into discourse around Gaza is the notion that genocide is a competition. “More people dead in n days in Gaza than in n months in Ukraine” is a statement that achieves only two goals: devalue human suffering and reveal the messenger to be a morally bankrupt psychopath.
Tell that to those raped and mutilated by those fucking victims of yours.
Oh wait, you outright dismissed their existence in order to… … not be racist.
Additionally, Ukraine is an example of protests working. A dangerous precedent to set for a country whose national myth claims that “Ukrainians are weird Russians”.
“Who started it” might work in kindergarten. Might.
Israel response is disproportional. It is also a single leaked document or an accidentally honest statement away from showing a clear genocidal intent. For now you could argue that it’s a sparkling ethnic cleansing.
Hamas being open about its genocidal intentions doesn’t render Israel indisputably good.
deleted by creator
Racism has nothing to do with casualty numbers discrepancy. Gaza Strip is a densely populated area.
Genocide is not a competition, it’s a crime against humanity. I don’t care whether Israel or Russia does it better, I care that both state actors are reveling in it.
Article II In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
The first bloody page. The article you were asked to read.
But what could I expect from someone who thinks genocide is a competition that one could lose if someone else did it better…
You had two options: read one damn sentence or insist on being a tool.
Of course you chose the latter.
Fucking liar.
Article two. Read it, and go silent until you grow a brain, a conscience, or both.
Russia explicitly, openly, and repeatedly states that they desire elimination of Ukrainian nation. Their official stance, repeated by their president and all the state media is that Ukraine and Ukrainians either don’t exist or are a “historical mistake”. Whether they target the entire nation or just the parts they can reach is of no import for the definition of genocide.
In fact, Russia ticks off all five definitions in article two and least points a), c), and d) of article three in Ukraine alone.
Genocide has five very precise definitions that have no connection to the type of war being waged.
You seem to be mistaking a chance to give your family a place to live with whatever the fuck a billion is supposed to offer them.
He’s achieving two of his goals: genocide of Ukrainians and genocide of minorities of Russian federation.
Why would he withdraw?
Every time someone confidently claims that we can cryptographically verify voting, they are deliberately or ignorantly keeping the complexity and necessity of verifying the verifier runtime, the data source, and the communication channels out of the picture.
Cryptography doesn’t solve voting verification problem, it obscures and shifts it.
Ten and a half. And that’s only if we discount Tuzla island dispute and continuous attempts to take control of politics and economy.