deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Indeed, and many are allowed to go about their lives while awaiting trial.

We have to be especially careful with people with significant resources. Any small mistakes caused by moving quickly can be leveraged for less consequences do to technicalities. In these cases, being reactionary is a detriment.

I think they call it “due process”.

Found in Table B-30 in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

• Race
• Color
• Religion
• Retaliation (a.k.a. reprisal)
• Sex/Gender (gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy)
• National origin (not nationality)
• Equal pay and compensation
• Age (over 40)
• Disability (physical or mental)
• Genetic Information

Yeah we have guidance to not discriminate and hire based on national origin. It’s better to look at the whole group of people we’ve hired and realize that there are a small number of people that do this. Still, I have conflicted feelings, and I’m trying my best to beat my biases. This is really the cost of moral actions, and it’s worth it.

That is awesome! Looking forward to the reviews I hope this game delivers everything promised!

I ran into an issue similar to this while hosting my server. Turns out there is a ”feature“ (seems bugged) on my ASUS router called “DDOS Protection” that mistook inbound lemmy traffic as attacks and just dropped them instead of forwarding them. Once that was disabled everything worked like normal. Maybe be worth trying.

Be ready to use other methods to deal with DDOS though.

went from like +300 fake points to -600. hurt worse than it should :’)

edit: it’s still ongoing, every post now starts with a net -7 vote, i think i’ll start adding a disclaimer on all my new comments lol

? Who? China?

edit: yooo, i just got bot downvoted by 16 on almost all my posts/comments, China mad.

i keep playing BF 2042 when i’m not sure what to play

holy cow thanks for sharing this! on my wishlist now!

Our conversation on a different post made me check your post history. And now this post has me considering canceling Amazon Prime. Ripple effects are weird.

This is primarily where the moral argument and thus division appear. Is it fair to ask a person to pay more than their share? I would argue no, it seems a majority here would argue yes. I’m ok with being wrong and learning, but I have a hard time shifting what I believe to be moral foundations.

edit: I appreciate you revisiting your statement and it makes a lot of sense. Something I’ll be thinking about a lot more.

The idea behind social security is a forced time phased retirement program. The cap for input of money serves to cap the withdrawal later in years. If the wealthy put in a significantly larger amount while working they will be entitled to a proportionally larger about of withdrawal later. We’re just robbing peter to pay paul here and kicking the issue down the road.

A real solution would be to produce a margin that is invested in a total market fund that would eventually create self sustaining returns to both: pay out current withdrawals as well as grow to match inflation and population growth. But that’s not going to happen.

TLDR: The ponzi scheme will continue.

Yeah I misred the purpose of his comment. Thanks.