• 0 Posts
  • 173 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 11th, 2023

help-circle


  • There are no more opponents of Putin’s course and, if there are, they are mentally ill and need to be sent off for clinical examination. Putin is everywhere, Putin is everything, Putin is absolute, and Putin is indispensable

    That Aleksandr Dugin?

    (I have read it, it’s… a textbook. Not derogatorily, it says nothing new because that’s not it’s goal and it does present it’s material in a pretty engaging way, it’s just not more than that (and it didn’t really claim to be))

    Okay but like, how exactly, did MAGA rise? He doesn’t specify that either, mind, he just makes the controversial claim that people would talk about the rise of a social movement they oppose. This is, in this case literally, propaganda 101. That you’re entrenching yourself so hard against someone presenting a contrary idea is the fundamental way this works. I’m not attacking or rejecting you, I promise, please believe me. I used to be pretty anti-feminist as a teen (thanks reddit), and like the cat says, we all fall for propaganda. There’s no shame in that.

    What I’m telling you is that this type of video (I think literally these ones with Yuri Bezmenov), where someone in a position of presumed authority claims that there’s a vast Global Communist Conspiracy (or the like) that will take down America if it doesn’t do things like “teach the next generation True Patriotism”, will be used ten years later as an example in Foundations of Geopolitics. You’re falling for the exact same propaganda that actually led to the rise of MAGA. It’s not “enabling social rise through careful manipulation and Marxist Leninist concepts being unchallenged”, it’s telling both sides they’re right and giving them proof that the other side is clearly being manipulated.

    (“It’s right in front of you” in particular means nothing. You can’t hide a huge social movement of the kind needed to destabilize a country, that just… doesn’t even make sense. It’s just a call to accept your own biases as factual. "It’s not a shadowy baseless conspiracy, it’s exactly whatever you think it is!")


  • … That video is a former KGB guy claiming color revolution theory as a real thing - it’s total bullshit, dreamed up to entice the same people that fall for Cultural Marxism today. It sounds really good, doesn’t it? But it’s all just confirmation bias - you’re ignoring everything else that’s happening, and the beats he lists off are incredibly common. Oh look:

    • The younger generation is more liberal
    • Your politicians are corrupt
    • The economy is being volatile
    • People won’t like changing their mind even when presented with evidence

    WOW! But we have recordings of people complaining about the same things carved into megaliths a few thousand years ago, so he’s not exactly going to burn out his crystal ball by predicting they might come up again. It’s the exact same kind of BS the CIA trots out to explain how it overthrew all those South American governments: they didn’t, they just took credit for it and everyone believed them because it sounds so good. If you want more evidence that his theories are bullshit, look around: Did the US fall to a “Global Communist Conspiracy” in the last 40 years…?





  • Nothing like it.

    Okay, and that’s why I didn’t write that list initially: it’s not useful to my initial point. I instead provided two examples of diplomatic restrictions from situations that are similar in political outlook, then called what trump is currently doing “an absurd escalation of that privilege for no other reason than trump’s ego.”

    He is not considering restricting all Iranians from shopping at costco (or “bulk goods / warehouse stores” to borrow what passes for their exact language), he is considering restricting the Iranian diplomatic visa holders from doing that. Since the title, while technically accurate, could be easily said to claim the former, I clarified. I don’t disagree at all that this is fucking absurd, just less so than it could have been interpreted to be.

    (A peace offering: consulate or embassy staff in the US often buy goods that cannot be supplied by their home country (food, linens, etc.) at these warehouse stores for safety reasons (this is how the whitehouse kitchen operates, too). Given the sales volume, the direct control the customer has over the product from the moment of selection and the sheer quantity of the stores that are available in a given urban area, it makes it infeasible for a product to have been tampered with prior to it reaching the diplomatic staff. By restricting access, Trump would create a massive logistical complication and threat vector for the Iranians)


  • It’s extremely normal for host countries to impose restrictions on the activity of diplomats

    That claim is independent of the examples I’ve already presented, that’s pretty explicit. I never claimed to be trying to present the whole of the spectrum of diplomatic visa processes with those examples. But sure, if you want specific but less relevant examples of what these restrictions look like, I can do that:

    • Restrictions on driving (must have an escort when driving)
    • No ability to obtain general government ID issued by a host-country (Cannot get a UK passport or endorsed ID as a non-naturalized foreign consulate worker)
    • Restrictions on property ownership
    • Requirement to notify for changes in address or marital status (famously a bit of a sticky one…)
    • Requirement to behave “in a manner befitting a representative of state” (don’t get caught with your dick out too many times)
    • Disclosure requirements for monetary transactions over a given value
    • A lack of access to public funds or services (no foodstamps, in the UK’s case free treatment from the NHS is negotiated)
    • Lack of ability to apply for permanent resident / green card / meet immigration residency requirements due to time accrued living in a country as part of a diplomatic visa
    • Exemptions to degrees of criminal prosecution (diplomatic immunity)

    Etc.

    It’s pretty boring though, and really doesn’t factor in to what’s going on in the above. The entire objective of my comment was just to clarify that trump is not considering a ban on shopping at costco for all Iranians (which would be stupid even for this administration) but a change to the diplomatic visa agreement between the US and Iran to include retail restrictions for their diplomatic staff, which is dumb but a lot less dumb than the title of the article implies.

    (edit: clarity)