Looks like the Cs are being Bs again…

Don’t be ridiculous, the UK would never do anything to harm vulnerable nations /s

Oh, so now it’s important when someone gets killed over there

If someone ironically pays me $8000, I’m still $8000 richer

Well, there’s no way he’s going to lose gracefully

(I know that’s not how you meant it)

I much prefer cannabis growers to landlords who have empty buildings, destroying high streets but still refusing to lower rents.

(Also, fuck landlords in general :) )

As long as it’s from supermarkets 😀

Those 0.85% that didn’t vote for Kagame are gonna be in trouble

That’s global warming for you

UN definition of genocide: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

Although you can’t technically genocide trans people because they’re not one of the special groups outlined in the definition, you don’t actually need to kill people to commit a genocide. I would argue that there is “intent to destroy, in whole or in part” trans people by “Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group” and “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”. By taking away healthcare and other accommodations, serious harm is caused to trans people. Couple this with the high suicide rates of bullied and marginalised trans people, one could argue that the lawmakers are intending to kill trans people (although I personally wouldn’t go that far)

UN definition of genocide: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

Although you can’t technically genocide trans people because they’re not one of the special groups outlined in the definition, you don’t actually need to kill people to commit a genocide. I would argue that there is “intent to destroy, in whole or in part” trans people by “Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group” and “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”. By taking away healthcare and other accommodations, serious harm is caused to trans people. Couple this with the high suicide rates of bullied and marginalised trans people, one could argue that the lawmakers are intending to kill trans people (although I personally wouldn’t go that far)

I live in a rural area and know a lot of farmers (meat, dairy and veg), none of whom are wealthy. Several don’t own land, but have to rent it instead. Those that do own land tend to be asset-rich but don’t actually have cash (as in, they own land and farm equipment, but they can’t sell it because then they wouldn’t be able to keep working). Maybe it’s different in other parts of the country, but around here people are struggling. We also have the issue of banks and other large corporations buying up land to plant with timber as carbon offsets, rather than putting in work to reduce their carbon footprint.

Since when are farmers wealthy?

Polluting vehicles are not the same as people… you know that, right? The reason for the ULEZ is to keep emissions low, not restrict tourism

For you Americans reading this, 1.3m is about 4’3"

;)

I didn’t know where this city was, I was just making a pun off of “highest”. Would’ve been more sensitive if I’d realised. Sorry :)

If they’d all stop doing drugs maybe they could’ve planned a bit better /s

Actually true though, in roughly half of all cases. More if you count cloud cover as not being blue

I am being sarcastic. We have a brown person as our prime minister, after all

I wish people would stop going on about Brexit. It was what the people wanted. Literally every single brown “”“person”“” has left the country and we don’t have any EU overlords shoving their rules down our throats. Every other aspect of our life bring worse and facing food shortages is a small price to pay