Indeed.

@joker@sh.itjust.works - moreso tactfully pointing out we must be aware of credential inflation and to avoid reliance on appeals to authority?

The naïve optimist in me wants the @HexesofVexes@lemmy.world of the world to keep on revealing their backgrounds as it adds to discussions for me. Disappointing that I should be more skeptical.

Dang it

Thank you

& yellowish for birb friends like San Jose, CA?

Are middle class American 2000s babies going to suffer?

(Gut feel is 2050 is gonna be ruff)

Could you add another Associated Press link in case someone misses the first two?

I bet Kim Dotcom was given quite a scare by this headline.

If not… maybe they’re being compensated accordingly. We can hope.

So if you’re a hiring manager and someone has experience working for him but doesn’t fawn over him, maybe you give them some serious credit and figure they were probably decent at their job plus they can work with anybody.

Well said

(not saying you are middle class or in a first world country, but given you are on lemmy and know what the nitrogen cycle is, it’s statistically likely).

And even cracking smiles with that :)

Hey that’s Fred Rogers you’re talking about here!

:(

I was surprised Hamas allowed it after the fake CIA vaccination thing with Osama.

Uneducated here, how?

Thanks for fighting for accuracy, desperately needed in the modern era.

Can you make a change today so that The Guardian & Breitbart would never appear to be similarly [un]credible at first glance?

If not, a small pause could make sense. Better than damaging credibility not much of established news agencies perhaps but certainly the bot, limiting its impact in the future even if the problem’s corrected (think insta-downvotes from older users once burned by it). Folks respect pauses for refactoring!

Maybe MBFC isn’t tops and there’s some attractive alternative btw!

PS: thanks @Five@slrpnk.net for the alarm

Seems you’d want to understand # of errors/omissions/mistruths as a proportion of total news stories, and the impact of and reason for those issues.

Get a sense Guardian is quite trustworthy but it would require a much more extensive look than the fact checker appears to have taken (and obviously than I’ve taken). Thanks for recommending caution here.

So if Sea Shepherd’s attacks were all honest, there would be less vitriol?

Does he lie in a specific way that implicates innocent people? (vs. lying in a way that garners broader attention and the attention is what drives the additional hate) Curious for some examples as someone low-information on the subject.

The one that’s all… ski ski, pew pew pew, ski ski ski? How did that one get started…

Wonder if this should be disabled for sources scoring medium or higher…

Interesting. Surprising you’d rape someone you’re not sexually attracted to. Quite sick in any case.

omg they WHAT

Great to know, wouldn’t wanna be associated with someone who seems to specialize in far-right businesses.

Interesting, had to check and see: 4chan is registered with Cloudflare.

A part of me would rather these baby Hitlers operating in the open in case it’s harder for the FBI to follow them around the dark web. Downside is clearnet makes it easier for low-braincell nazis to communicate. Woulda thought we’d have socially stomped out extremism by now so doing it technologically wouldn’t be necessary…

Alas.

Hopefully it’s not a common last name + a first name that suddenly became popular, could imagine it getting scooped by someone else.