Wow you’re insane. “I know, I’ll discredit the woman who just pointed out that it’s hard to get credit in her field as a woman ”

Did you get lost?

Again: not what the person said. They said that if someone proves that you host CSAM, you should take it down.

No, that’s not what the person is saying in the slightest. Just read their comment again, it’s actually very clear.

No. You can say that about so many laws being made, but telegram simply hosts the most vile shit.

Not just all cultures, all eras as well. From Mesopotamian stone slates over medieval hogshide, paper to the internet: boomers gonna complain

But you did insult. You asserted that living in a city isn’t a voluntary choice, therefore taking agency away from people who choose to live in a city.

You’re both pivoting (now you’re suddenly talking about production) and wrong. Cities produce cross pollination between minds. Art, science, philosophy. Cities are where the ideas for photovoltaics were seeded and developed. Cities are where most music genres emerged.

We live in a world where currently, the most popular alternative to city living is being a narrow-minded redneck who holds their gas guzzler as the ultimate expression of freedom. Anarchist communes in the countryside might be part of the solution, but I bet you that what’s going on in and around the city will also play a vital role.

Seems like you grew up in a very puritanical place.

Nudity is objectively neutral.

What an asinine take. I choose to live in a city because I can meet many different friends in many different interesting spots, where we can e.g. eat excellent iterations of different cuisines.

All without sitting my ass in a car and driving for an hour to meet a single couple that lives in some other hamlet. Or having to plan the exact amount of drinks and food to consume before the evening starts. And I can do that multiple times per week if I please.

You like living in the countryside, I get it. Don’t pretend that’s somehow objectively better lol

Judging from how I completely missed that and read it as “right-wing” I just assume it’s autocorrect gone wrong with no editor spotting it either

If you read the article, you will see that two thirds (so also his voters) take the hush money trial seriously.

That wasn’t my question

What do you mean? Don’t you think transitioning to mostly renewables while coal and gas go down are good things?

Try reading the article. Coal went down drastically.

Definitely. Who ever trusts conservatives to stick to their word about not doing a coalition with fascists?

This is AfD, our resident fascist clown party. At least we have a coalition based democracy, so it’s unlikely that they take over the less fascist “center”-right party.

The both-sidesing was already telling. Sometimes the only “controversial or alternative viewpoints” are just idiotic conspiracy drivel and should be presented as such (or not at all)

And?

A vote for a 3rd party is a vote for the opponent. Everyone says this. I simply do not buy it.

That’s the part you got wrong. The voting system means that no 3rd party has a chance. Therefore you’d effectively abstain. And that means you don’t vote to keep the candidate you hate more out of the office.

And if you really think that Trump isn’t worse in every way to your interests as a leftist, you live in a deep hole under a rock.

Trump would also support Israel. And since a third party has all the chances of a particularly small popsicle in hell, that means there’s no choice for or against supporting Israel. So you’re doing the only reasonable thing.