Let’s maybe not call it the final solution.
Let’s maybe not call it the final solution.
I agree with you but UKR may not have the luxury of triaging a bunch of people into non combat roles, and with regard to reaction under fire, I don’t think anyone really knows how they’re going to react in that situation until they’re in it. Even volunteers.
I’m not and never have been military, just my £0.02.
You almost made me snort peas.
Did they have to make it look just like the one in Black Mirror?
So hey, er. Everything ok at home?
It all just horrible, any which way you slice it. Gut wrenching.
I don’t doubt for a second the IDF have a shitload to answer for, but the propaganda machine is polarising people into a flat rejection of measured discourse, as usual.
Have you seen much of Jeremy Bowen at all?
In the UK zeitgeist, it’s at least relatively left wing.
Edit: on this specific topic. Not the Toryshambles.
Ok flame away, as clearly I’m going to be downvoted to oblivion or banned, but:
I read just now on the BBC that most of the casualties were due not to gunfire, as all the posts suggest, but to the aid Lorries driving over people in what seems like scenes of chaos and probable panic… and this is from a news outlet that leans to the left.
I’m not pro Hamas or IDF but I feel like (deserved or not), if what the Beeb say is true, then we’re allowing ourselves to get carried away here.
I know, but this would happen whether war crimes were intended or not.
It is normal to disrupt and jam all communication ahead of an invasion.
IEDs, tactical comms etc.
That’s the one where patients went to after the bombing. The one hit, according to the article, was the Al-Ahli Hospital.
Tsar right to know if he’s compromised.