• 13 Posts
  • 1.24K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle




  • If you wanna read the whole thing deep, visit my main community “BharatReforms” and join it for further similar and informative updates.

    Just so everyone is aware what “Bharat Reform” actually means:

    It’s a far right extremist pro-Modi movement in India, which is the same the other communities OP moderates, just slightly less blatant to ease people into the hate.

    Hindutva, right-wing ethno-nationalist political ideology that defines the cultural identity of India in terms of Hinduism and desires to make India an overtly Hindu nation-state. The term Hindutva was first defined in the early 1920s by Indian nationalist activist and politician Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. Today it is most closely associated with the Bharatiya Janata Party (Hindi/English: Indian People’s Party; BJP), one of the main political parties in India, and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (Hindi: National Volunteer Organization; RSS), a nonpolitical Hindu nationalist paramilitary organization. Hindutva supporters, or Hindutvavadis, claim to advocate for India’s significant Hindu-majority population—as of 2011 India was 79.8 percent Hindu, 14.2 percent Muslim, and the rest a mix of Christians, Sikhs, and others—and seek to redefine the idea of secularism enshrined in the Indian constitution in terms of Hindu rights.

    Hindutva as an ideology must be understood as distinct from Hinduism as a religion—not all adherents of Hinduism subscribe to Hindutva—and Savarkar’s original definition asserts Hindutva as an ethnic category and eschews a specific religious connotation. In current practice the ideology tends to be strongly pro-Hindu and staunchly anti-Muslim. However, supporters often define Hindutva in purely cultural terms as a “way of life.”

    https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hindutva

    It’s like rolling up MAGA and Zionists into one group







  • The reason this stuff is important to understand, is so we can fight it effectively and prevent it from happening again:

    Sociopathy is normal human variation…

    It’s associated with criminals, because the earliest definitions required criminality, so the only population they’d check were violent criminals, which reinforced flawed beliefs that every sociopath was a violent criminal. Medical community is making progress, but it’ll likely take decades to shake that stigma so it can actually be studied properly.

    Shit, a high enough IQ is almost guaranteed to come along with ASPD.

    trump is way worse than just someone with ASPD, he’s most likely making a conscious effort not to care about others if it benefits himself, or even enjoys hurting others. Someone with actual ASPD doesn’t get joy from hurting people, they just don’t really care unless they’re putting a conscious effort into caring.

    Which many do. But many people without ASPD want to cause pain, because they’re shitty people and fully understand what the people they’re hurting feel, if trump couldn’t feel the suffering of others in anyway, he wouldn’t go out of his way to hurt so many people.


  • The NRA used to argue against CCW and AR ownership, shit, even the inventer Euegen Stoner never understood why a random civilian would want one…

    It changed in the 70s when essentially a coup backed by lobbyists from gun manufacters happened. That’s when it went from a hunting/conservation club to the rapid “pry it from my cold dead hands” modern NRA.

    In 2026 there’s a very good reason for CCW and AR ownership, but if we fix society so we’re not under threat of fascists, that changes.


  • I’m kind of alright with this…

    Pelosi is a piece of shit and a huge problem not just for the country but the Dem party.

    Being the first people to go down to show everyone else how undeniably serious this shit is, is pretty much the only way old guard neolibs are gonna be useful.

    They won’t fight, and they block people who would from holding their positions. So there’s no benefit from them staying in office.

    Maybe Pelosi being run thru a kangaroo court will make the rest of them finally realize how serious this shit is. Even if they still won’t fight, they might resign and flee the country, again opening up their positions to people willing to fight.


  • It’s crazy how many people try to be smug about this.

    All you’re doing is telling everyone it took shit this blatant and obvious for you to notice if you think this is a new problem.

    I understand being ignorant of another country’s system of government, but how do you not know all the fucked up shit that’s been happening before this to think it’s new?

    The “big 3” have been doing this shit for centuries, and before that it was just different countries.

    Shuffling the countries around like you want to won’t solve shit. It just perpetuates the system itself…

    Have you put any thought into this?



  • To reach their conclusions, the study authors focused on the idea of cover-ups, the belief that organizations and governments deliberately hide the truth from the public. They surveyed 253 people from several countries, asking them to rate statements such as “politicians usually do not tell us the true motives for their decisions” and “government agencies closely monitor all citizens.”

    Uh…

    Someone should let the researchers out of the lab occasionally…

    If anyone disagreed with:

    “politicians usually do not tell us the true motives for their decisions” and “government agencies closely monitor all citizens.”

    Then they either live in some random Nordic utopia, or they’re the crazy ones.

    Like, an international child rape ring involving multiple world leaders is the biggest news story of the decade, but only two people went to prison over it and one is about to get pardoned.

    It’s 2026 and you’re crazy if you don’t believe in at least one conspiracy.