Rather if they get merged without edits.
I’ve seen even minor changes without flawed technique or style being discussed and changed for days before getting merged.
But it’s also an excellent way to learn from pros. If the PR is worth it, they will spend the time for review and work with you until you fixed everything.
was first to report about israel’s nukes, exposed journalists on CIA payroll and various other great pieces of journalism.
It is a music magazine but I see far worse news sources on social media.
So you are saying
“The belief that climate change is unstoppable”
is the same thing as
“a temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius is an existential threat to humanity”
Those are fundamentially different things and you just pulled some study you think is fitting to OPs article. But allright… I’m the one who’s illiterate.
Guy said “don’t be hyperbolic about the 1.5c goal because if people feel hopeless they are less likely to act.”
Then he’s wrong. But it’s more likely you misread the study since that’s not the conclusion.
100.0 TiB(anana)
there will be a ‘bastards up against the wall’ moment for the ones responsible.
i can’t see how that could prevent that. Quite the opposite, if half-assed efforts (without “state of emergency”) lead to higher impact, people will get angrier than with lower impact, simply because more will have to struggle harder.
But first the environmental conditions must allow such activities to have the impacts they have.
Exactly. There might even be the same amount of arsonists/stupid people as in the 80s but it just burns better now. Incidents were no fire developed in the 80s can now spread to huge wildfires with a much higher chance.
Still the claim is true and probably has consequences for hikers, people who live in the woods, settlements near to forrests etc.
climate change unstoppable != scary life threatening consequences
Those are two entirely different narratives.
(And I didn’t get past the paywall.)
because it’s making people feel hopeless and apathetic, which is actually slowing our efforts to change.
That’s the thing I don’t get. How to come to such a conclusion?
If you ever have been on a sinking ship, you know how suddenly even the worst enemies will cooperate willingly quite well in face of time pressure and a life threat. Some might even be willing to sacrifice themselves when in such a situation, even a few minutes gained can make a huge difference. But aswell if the situation seems hopeless.
It’s totally atypical for most humans to just accept fate and relax in any life threatening situation. Humans tend to die fighting/ defending.
How is it stupid? It’s true and not even contradicting OPs experience.
Yearly. They look at slices generated by compressed layers of snowfall. Thick layer = cold year. They look at more stuff but that’s roughly how it works.
edit: not sure why you’re downvoted. It’s a good question.
I doubt that’s a linux problem. All apps store config in /etc, ~/.*rc or ~/.config
Everything else should be considered a bug (looking at you, systemd!)
TL;DR
Python optimizes “assert” statements out with -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE set and some users seem to use it for stuff critical in production instead of raising cheaper Exceptions.
your own fault. get a nuclear reactor next time d’uh…