setVeryLoud(true);

Fair point

Cuba was destabilized economically destabilized by the US tbf

Oh okay so every government contractor is a non-profit?

“Look at what you made me do!”

We got, uh, muffins?

He’s definitely not autistic

The nicest part is you don’t HAVE to use a latching plug. Friction fit plugs are compliant with the standard, and they are available for sale. My Dell 1440p 165hz displays came with a very nice friction fit DisplayPort cable.

https://a.co/d/eCiOkiN

Latching connectors are better for permanent setups or commercial displays however, as they won’t wiggle themselves loose.

Just because it’s more ubiquitous doesn’t make it a better plug.

DP 2.1 is technically superior to HDMI in many ways, especially since it’s the protocol that runs through USB C and supports daisy chaining, unlike HDMI which has to be converted to and from DP to be passed through USB C.

I don’t see your argument with “it’s a better plug” either, the DisplayPort connector is available as a locking or non-locking connector, is keyed better than HDMI and in my experience is more solid.

The only reason HDMI is as common as it is is because there’s a consortium putting money into it to keep it popular because they can charge license fees from manufacturers. DP is free to use and developed by VESA, the standard can be downloaded directly from their website and added to whatever device you’re developing with no need to license. HDMI charges licensing fees PER PORT, which is why you often see GPUs with one HDMI and three DPs.

TL;DR: HDMI is only more common because a group has in its best financial interests to keep it popular, despite it playing catch-up with DP.

No SSO yet :(

I want a return to cartridges, like the switch.

It is, I think it’s been discussed to hell and back that it was the reason.

Jitsi now needs a MS or Goog account

No dude I legit can’t fucking tell what you’re saying

Wut? Can someone translate the post to English?

Chromium is pretty safe to use. There are also builds of “de-googled Chromium” available.

Because their law requires it for “modesty reasons”, probably like a uniform of some sort, but it’s not a religious garment in Islam. It covers the whole body except the head, feet and hands. Anyone wearing an Abaya outside of Qatar and Saudi Arabia is doing so for cultural reasons, not religious reasons.

These kinds of laws should not oppress culture, unless we want to see an extinction of diversity. They should exist solely to limit religious child indoctrination, and give children a fighting chance to make their own decisions with regard to religion.

The Abaya is cultural and not religious though.

Why would American live in Canada? Isn’t America developed than Canada?

Sugar cane, silly, not candy cane :)

It’s wood pulp, there is almost zero sugar in a sugar cane once they’re done extracting the cane sugar out of it, which is when it can be re-used to do other things.

It’s made of bagasse (sugarcane fibers, basically wood pulp) and binders like PLA and is entirely compostable.

Correct :)

It’s basically made of wood pulp.

I do love people’s knee jerk reaction at the word “sugar”. I don’t think they’ve ever seen a sugar cane, they’re probably imagining this: