

The mission of Codeberg is to kill GitHub. If people won’t be able to transfer ALL their repos over, not concerning themselves with what is compatible, that would be substantially harder to achieve.


The mission of Codeberg is to kill GitHub. If people won’t be able to transfer ALL their repos over, not concerning themselves with what is compatible, that would be substantially harder to achieve.


If copyright status is the reason, they should ban any, even a single-line AI contributions.
And it seems a short-sighted decision. Now AI is slop, but what about in 10? 20 years? They would rewrite TOS again?
And what about people they want to migrate from GitHub?


Average JoJo backstory


I have a hammer hanging above the hard drive on a string, and every time I want to access it, I have to convince an AI it’s really me. If doubt level rises above 20%, the hammer drops.


Can you encode them as base64 URL?


That’s median.


How does a method being traditional make it more ethical? Aren’t more ethical methods of hunting about minimising agony of an animal when killed using all available technology? So a firearm shot would be more ethical than slow-to-kill arrow?
What else can it possibly be?