Some people are able to understand context.
Some people are able to understand context.
Given the state of Xitter, I would argue that his control of Starlink is significantly more dangerous.
You couldn’t even refute those idiotic points properly.
My brother in Christ, they invented paper, fireworks, and the compass.
True. And irrelevant.
Because they developed more efficient engineering techniques and more advanced methods of industrial scale production. In the same way Japan ate the American auto industry’s lunch during the 80s and 90s by investing heavily in industry and education, China is flooding the zone with talented professionals and capital improvement projects.
And because the Chinese government is heavily subsidizing their auto industry in order to gain market share works wide. Pros for us: if we can buy these cars, the Chinese government is essentially subsidizing them for our consumers. Cons for us: without equivalent subsidies domestic car companies can’t possibly compete. There are genuine issues of trade fairness in play here.
The Chinese middle class is the largest in the world.
Relevant only if the Chinese middle class is who is working in those car factories. Is that the case?
I’m not even saying the tarrifs are good or bad. If they’re explicitly time boxed and our governments are able to stick to that deal, then they could be good. But in general tarrifs on EVs during a climate crisis driven by carbon emissions is explicitly counterproductive.
They’re not being actively held hostage in that there’s no giant prison with all their families in it.
They are being held hostage because of the implication. The whereabouts of their family is well known so are they going to toe the line? Of course, because of the implication.
Your comments is literally just ad-hominem too bruh.
Putin accuses the West of doing something the West is openly doing complete with detailed press releases.
This is one of the dumber conspiracies. No one anywhere on the political spectrum wants war with China. It would lead to an immediate economic disaster, so rich people don’t want it either.
I suppose one might call the allegations unfounded, but without evidence to the contrary they can’t reasonably be called false.
Neither can the allegation that I’m making right now, that you are a pedophile.
There’s probably some plan for that depending on how much chaos occurs when Putin croaks. Their objectives will likely include securing as many nukes as possible. Land mass will be secondary.
It’s highly likely that you had one or more bad-but-not-dead cables (like a weak termination) that was limiting your speed. By swapping everything out you fixed the problem. Cat 5e to 8 definitely shouldn’t have caused that much if a jump (if any).
They will never ever return those children. And if they somehow did, a lot of them were so young that they won’t recognize their real parents. The magnitude of that crime is absolutely staggering.
deleted by creator
The Republicans are capitalists. The Democrats are capitalists. To Marxists they are the same.
Meaningful, important distinctions can exist even when Marxists are unable to recognize them.
Social democratic reforms can alleviate the inequality and distribute the wealth more equitably, but, because it does not replace capitalism itself, it always falters.
Explain? Because systems ultimately fail , it’s no good? Longevity and risilience are worthwhile considerations when designing and economic system to govern a civilization, but uktimate fallibility does not invalidate them entirely. More to the point, what evidence is there that Marxists societies do/would last longer?
Again, that is not the claim that was made. You can’t even stay on topic. I bet Marx could stay on topic .
Yes, he and you are obviously wrong. Even if everything you said was 100 percent true (lol) the people who failed to stop facism are obviously not the same as fascists themselves. Everything thinking person knows this , and Marx would too if he was alive.
Sounds dumber everytime you say it.
You don’t agree with most aspects of reality.
It’s definitely not.
Life has a carbon impact. Forcing this burden disproportionately on athletes while spectators (not to mention corrupt IOC officials) enjoy hotels with AC is ridiculous.
Why are you like this