Reuters is the best paper out there, full stop.

No-one is surprised or acting surprised that the bomb was used, people are upset at how.

No-one reputable is going to report on this, but you did some weird searches if you only found Murdoch sources for it. The primary sources on this are, in chronological order:

1. The Daily Fail, which is owned by Harmsworth and Rothermere, not Murdoch.
2. The IDF releasing the videos directly (abundant re-sharing meant I failed to find where the IDF originally posted them).

Daniel Noboa sounds like a welfare queen. Tax incentives are welfare.

No-one seems.to be discussing the third moose.

OPP said the officers responding to the first collision had also just finished investigating another crash between a car and a moose, but there were no serious injuries in that incident.

No, the US gov is not fundamentally evil.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study

the person who takes Raisi’s place is going to be really influential

Impossible. President of Iran is a powerless figurehead position.

The next Supreme Leader will be relevant, though.

Woa, buddy.

Among the myriad ways to tell that there is no world government… if there was a single world government, money would be irrelevant to situations like this - there would be no issue to smooth over because no-one’s sovereignty would have been violated.

I’m guessing all other posters responding to the post directly are kneejerking it without clicking, because the original link OP posted just doesn’t fucking work.

Paywall bypass.

Why would Gazans attack a pier being built to being them aid?

Hamas would absolutely, unquestionably attack a pier being built to bring Gazans aid. Hamas has never been interested in helping their fellow Gazans - which is why e.g. they committed Oct 7 in the first place, even though it was guaranteed to make life worse in Gaza. You’re confusing a tyrannical terroeist group with the Gazan people in general, i.e. you’re spouting the same rhetoric Netanyahu does.

You’re using sensationalist language to hide the fact that you’re the person in this conversation arguing for more aexual abuse of children, not me. I’m advocating for using drawn artwork to reduce abuse of children. You’re advocating for banning said artwork, which we know leads to more abuse of real children.

Please stop supporting pedophilia.

This sort of problem-solving acumen is how HIV became so widespread in Africa. Have you considered instead trying competence?

This beggars belief. Why lure the civilians out before killing them, when you can just kill them in their camp without doing so? What could possibly be the point?

Historically, when a political party’s nominating convention occurs after a state deadline for certifying nominees, states have either enacted laws to push back the deadline – as Ohio did in 2012 and 2020 – or accepted a provisional certification from the party.

This Allen guy is brand new and does not appear to understand the law he’s sworn to uphold.

Contrary to Linkerbaan’s claims, this is mentioned in the article.

From the article:

Israel said they were Hamas operatives

Separate bit from the article:

The Israeli military said Mohammed and Hazem were Hamas military operatives and that Amir was a cell commander. It said they had conducted militant activity in the central Gaza Strip, without elaborating.

What this article fails to contain is any sort of rebuttal - the closest it comes is this, which isn’t a rebuttal or denial:

Haniyeh accused Israel of acting in “the spirit of revenge and murder.”

I can’t find any sources claiming the three were civilians. So to reiterate: Israel killed 7 people, claiming 3 were military targets and 4 were civilian collateral damage. Hamas (or rather, the Hamas leader who was the dead people’s patriarch) claimed the killings were an act of revenge. Both can be true, and I can’t find any sources rebutting either claim.

1. Mondoweiss is a garbate site whose “news” is not to be trusted.
2. “Becoming”? Germany has been extremely opposed to free speech since before Israel existed. There’s no “becoming” here, it’s always been like this.

Yes, it’s deeply weird that a judge would have that power. It’s like forcing a grocery store to ban a customer who’s been throwing tomatoes at people, rather than just locking up the tomato-thrower. Why would a judge have the power to punish someone who committed no crime and is just set-dress8ng for a criminal case?

Put another way: why is this judge ordering X to ban the accounts instead of ordering the account holders to delete their accounts?

So he was unable to go to the bathroom, I guess? Because the plane was not at the gate yet?

Well in that case, as disgusting as this may be, you can’t fine anyone for having bodily functions. I believe peeing in a cup is the right thing to do. Better than on the floor.

Why is this such a thing on Lemmy? Why do people comment on articles they haven’t read?

From the article:

She said the man was “obviously quite drunk” and spilled urine on a flight attendant as he left the plane, it reported.

He was drunk and making drunk decisions.

Anyone who disagrees with the tribe is “trolling,” that’s how bad it’s gotten.

That would be bad enough if they didn’t then also advocate incarcerating people for disagreeing with them.

I think Denolition Man should be required viewing for any conversation about good vs bad laws. It’s worrying how few people seem to be aware of the ideas in that movie.