The unfiltered dogshit opinions of a Tylenol enthusiast
Oh if you’re a tankie then fuck you idiot
It’s not in question anymore, thank you for the confirmation.
Anyone willing to agitate themselves like this has got to be drooling on the floor moronic.
It’s also obvious that you give a massive fuck, otherwise you wouldn’t jump into a convo this far in.
Well at least I can age the bottle of bubbly I got.
Removed by mod
Yet you keep reading so I have to question your intelligence.
"I don’t believe as a VP he thinks… "
Sorry but clearly you’ve never met a high level executive because expecting them to think is already asking too much, never mind understanding anything about operation.
This is extremely par for the course, the executives I’ve met are some of the dumbest people I’ve ever seen in person, they just present well.
That never fails to make me smile
“People thought”
“People hoped”
With your heritage you are the expert in bigotry
Sorry about your overwhelmingly Nazi heritage, hope it gets better.
Found the pole
It’s crazy, I feel so irresponsible but it’s just the economic situation we’re in.
I cannot find a single place to rent that’s only 1/3rd of my income and not half.
American one piece ain’t fucking around
The truth is, the tub was rigged from the start
If someone’s opinions are entirely formed by Russian propaganda memes then yeah. This guy didn’t pick Russia at random he chose it because he was influenced.
Imagine the h3h3/Hasan drama if this was a thing
My problem is that these labels don’t differentiate the levels at which demonstrable harm occurs. I’m not against labels, I’m against bad labels
Putting something that’s harmful at the parts per million(ppm) level in the exact same category as something that’s harmful in the parts per billion(ppb) level is counterproductive.
This results in people treating incredibly harmful compounds that are dangerous in the ppb range the same as compounds that are dangerous in the ppm or even ppt(thousand) range.
Including minor and major carcinogens in the same label makes people think they’re safer than they are.
It’s why prop65 warnings are a joke and ignored by almost all consumers.
If we’re going to use a single label that doesn’t differentiate the level of harm then we need to save it for the most harmful compounds only.
Tldr: Without more information on the label putting nitrates in the same category as asbestos or lead is counterproductive via implied false equivalence.
I actually had it backwards, unsaturated fats are horrendously bad.
Their molecular shape makes them more grabby than saturated fats.
This grabbyness makes them clog your arteries faster than saturated fats.
It has to do with the availability of hydrogen binding spots, unsaturated fats have room for more hydrogen bonds, saturated fats don’t.
Lmao a carcinogen tier list would unironically be fantastic because it would help me gauge the relative risk.
I just feel like putting evering into one big bucket is lazy as fuck and doesn’t really help anyone.
Exactly, just slapping a “warning cancer” label on literally everything does absolutely nothing to help me actually protect myself.
Low blood sugar and toxic personality, if I had to guess.