very reliable cloud
very reliable cloud
why can’t the US solve navigation issues in the Mississippi when there’s a massive drought? And then blaming them poor people in Mississippi
that is a federal problem for which the federal government is responsable. Likewise, i was accusing the government of Panama, not its people
like all old century inventions, the thing isn’t sustainable since fresh water is finite, and the next thing close to regenerating those fresh reserves is energy-hungry desalination. might as well adress the problem head-on and power the canal with a power plant to actively fill the locks with sea water…but since its run by a third world country, i doubt they would do anything about it and instead act complacent and let things run their course
lets see how this would pan out. also europeans didn’t make their ariane rockets as profitable as spacex did, and never achieved booster vertical landing. Spacex has a record of delivering on their promises, so they kinda should be taken seriously.
they aren’t creating any value: oil will be irrelevant because it got so much weaponized that it incentivized spending for renewables. Oil rich middle eastern countries invest in laughable assets like F1 teams and airlines, anything that would promote oil use. Airlines will ultimatly go instinct once SpaceX starts shuttling people across the globe in less than one hour, instead of what used to be 12 hour flights (less than 8 hour flights shouldn’t be feasable by Starship, or aren’t economically viable). Such countries have alot of money and just keep investing in trends.
if each worker was guaranteed 5mbit of download, there probably were about 75 units maybe lol, or 50 if the mine was served by 3 shifts per day
so not working under rain is just a myth? would be worth it otherwise then. because people living at the equator would be struggling otherwise
true, makes all the sense. also it sucks that isps are leeching on taxpayer handouts, with no value in return
thats cool, when a gov or a state decides to fund such thing. but also companies like google or meta piggybacking on isps by using excessive amounts of bandwidth, they should fund network installations like this instead, it least lay the grounds for relays and whatnot.
about to read it
are u a tech nomad haha ? if u are please stop paying portugese rent with californian salary or whatever, u would ruin it for locals. not cool bro! cool if u dont 👌
i remember reading someone saying that he was paying 70$/month for a 4Mb/s downstream (wtf), and probably was comcast. what a shitty company that is
possibly
There are a lot of things to dislike about him and some things each company does, but that needs to be separated out for each company. Elon’s attitude has nothing to do with Starlink’s performance, but some online commenters will try to mix them.
yea, totally agree on this
would be cool if there was a terminal that could support 1Gbit download, but probably would cost 1k$ per month and terminal would cost…4k$ ?, but also could take it anywhere: hongkong, australia, chile, the arctic, u name it…
it really makes sense if u travel alot, and dont want to deal with random data roaming shenanigans. 100$ per month is nothing for a weekly traveller
would be interested if u could provide a link ? i already have the SpaceX twitter app installed haha
glad to know. people really have mixed takes about this
tbh i am not responsible for what u did understand. ur mind, ur rules. i hate to repeat myself but what i meant is that using fresh water to fill the locks passively using gravity albeit it is tempting it is in fact a waste of fresh water. so saving fresh water must be a priority and instead we could actively fill the locks using sea water, but at an energy cost, yet it is durable since energy is abundant (especially clean forms of thereof). tbh i am waiting on the day when i can mute notifications of replies to my comments, such a distraction really…