• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    Either I’ve not understood your point, or you’re suggesting that spammers would limit themselves to one instance?

    Spam is about volume, and a 0.1% takeup rate would be a dream for a spammer.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 年前

      I actually typed 99.999% first, but then decided some stickler would for sure question that number then 🤦

      The point is that operating on hundreds of different pages that each have limited reach and interact only in a limited fashion in a way that isn’t a problem for legitimate users but severely limits the volume spammers can reach is a lot of work. Spam only makes sense when it is cheap to do and high volume.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        Sorry, I’m still stuck on what the limiting aspect of it is. “Operating on hundreds of pages that each have limited reach” costs next to nothing if it’s all automated with bots.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          This assumes all these hundreds of pages are exactly the same and can be automated with bots without anyone noticing immediately.

          There is a reason why spam on the Fediverse almost exclusively comes from a few large generic servers.