• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Luckily, we can choose to reject reality and believe whatever makes us feel better.

      I feel best believing the biosphere is gonna force humanity to “find out” for the last century of fuckin around with a recklessly unplanned terraform.

            • minorsecond@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why does it seem like there are a ton more conservatives here on Lemmy than there were on Reddit?

                • minorsecond@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t know how I feel about it. On one hand, it makes for less of an echo chamber. On the other hand, their thoughts are fucking stupid and it hurts my brain to see them.

                • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Man I am kinda sorry, that I invade your worldview.

                  But rich people don’t have all their money stored in a vault like Dagobert Duck. It’s all stocks.

                  And boy, if one of the companies make losses, then their money goes downhill. It’s volatile.

                  And due to immense concurrence in innovation in the tech sector, every investor has a huge interest in innovation.

                  And with many investment, the start of a company is ensured.

                  The current capitalism is the system that works best.

                  Especially the US capitalism is one hell of a driver in innovation. I live in Germany and many companies wouldn’t be possible here. Even though we have capitalism, it’s much softer than its US counterpart.

                  The downside of course is poverty for cheaper labour.

                  And that’s brutal, but it’s the reality we live in.

                  Though I wouldn’t want to live in the US without healthcare, on the counter side I wouldn’t want to start a company here in Europe.

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My uber driver said that global warming is actually true but have literally nothing about human influence.

      Some years ago these persons were saying that global warming was a hoax, now that only the human influence is a hoax.

      • Sjatar@sjatar.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Had a argument with a person on YouTube, he thought that increased CO2 in the atmosphere would be beneficial. It would help plants grow better!

        Also that humans was not behind it.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ahhh, yes. The conservative backpedalling.

        It’s not happening. It’s happening but it’s all cyclical. It’s not cyclical this time but it’s not our fault. It’s our fault but global warming is good ackshually. Global warming is bad but there’s nothing we can do about it. We could do something about it but it’s too expensive/late. Maybe it’s not too expensive but THE CHINESE!

        • Juris_LLM@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.

          Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.

          In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there’s nothing we can do.

          Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it’s too late now.

    • Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I hear some acquaintances say is like “who cares, I’ll go to the beach, turn the AC on, what’s the big deal” .

      As if the floods we had in Italy this year, or the wild fires, or the storms, or the draughts, or the Alps without snow, the glaciers disappeared, the sea turned green, the invasion of jellyfish weren’t connected.

      Some people, most people, are just too fucking stupid.

  • FapFlop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to be subbed to /r/collapse. I see world news is covering that for me.

  • Magzmak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m ready for companies to do their ad campaigns about how they are saving the earth with their new policies and products.

    Fuck it, please just profit from saving the earth. I dont care if its just doing what we’ve been asking them to do for the past 30yrs.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, they’ll do the ad campaigns and raise the prices in the name of green-ness.

      Don’t expect them to actually contribute in any meaningful way though.

      They know the game over screen is coming as much as we do, they’re just going for the high score first.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, they’ll do the ad campaigns and raise the prices in the name of green-ness.

        A classic example of this is electric utilities charging more and saying “all our electricity comes from renewable sources!” while ignoring the fact that renewable energy is typically cheaper for them to buy on the market.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nothing wrong with saving money by doing something objectively good, so that’s frankly a lousy example…

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You misunderstand. I’m saying the end user energy company justifies being on the more expensive side by advertising that they use renewables, but actually when they buy electricity renewables is cheaper for them. So they’re paying less but charging the end user more.

            The cost saving of renewables is rarely passed on to the consumer.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah ok, NOW I see what you’re getting at! That IS pretty scummy!

              Still not as scummy as still relying on fossil fuel now that there’s literally no good reason to, though…

              • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean there is some reason not to, at least until proper alternatives are set up. I work in the HV industry, and in my opinion we’ve rushed to close larger, relatively efficient coal plants and replace them with smaller, far less efficient diesel and gas generators that can be hidden behind tall fences in industrial estates. These pollute far more per MW than coal plants, but they’re out of sight, out of mind.

                We definitely should be going hard into current renewable technology to fill out demand. That’s the fastest way to net zero in many regions. There is something to be said for big rotating generators though, ie large turbines, as these provide voltage and frequency stability - renewables are often inverter driven, even wind turbines, so these are always following the grid and can destabilise if voltage or frequency goes. Meanwhile, a large machine has inertia so it will want to keep spinning and maintain the same output when large loads switch in and out. This sort of thing can be provided by nuclear power. So if we build lots of renewables now to get clean, then build nuclear to fill out, that might be the best solution.

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I could go into detail about the many ways in which you’re wrong, but it’s frankly not worth the time and effort, especially with the detailed back and forth that would inevitably follow, so I’ll just cut to the chase and summarise:

                  NO

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Stupid thing is that it’s locally so cold that I had to turn the heat back on last week after having it off for two months. Just a few weeks back I had to bring the fans down from the attic to stay cool. Shit is just weird. This summer is going to be fucked. There’s also not the usual pollen or insects.

    Anyway, if you’re interested in visiting Denmark as a tourist, I can currently only recommend mid May or early September. The remaining 47 weeks of the year are “normal” 10°c and windy rain regardless of seasons.

  • Knightfall@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering here in Winnipeg, Canada, where it reaches -35C or even colder, it was pretty wild having weeks on end of +30C to even +39C temperatures, and so soon into our summer.

    I never want to complain about the heat when we have snow for 7 months, but that was ridiculous.

    • ntzm [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whataboutism, the west contributes significantly more per capita than China. Yes they should be doing more but it’s better focused elsewhere

    • jossbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thank fuck for that. Now if we can only turn off all the other a.c. as well, we’d have made a start!

      Edit: this was a joke, but wow, you Americans are really defensive about your AC. I live in the UK and the rare times it gets very hot we are miserable because our building almost never have AC, and are built to retain heat. So I do see how much more comfortable it makes you.

      Someone, who was trying to argue in favour of AC, said it uses 10% of all electricity globally. Thats insane! I guess we actually do need to turn it all off.

      • Texas_Hangover@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you live outside? Under a liquid cooled tree? In a temperate zone? Never used electricity in your life?

        • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bro imagine intentionally living in a temperate zone where you don’t need expensive resources to not die. I cannot believe these people. Total morons. Living in a swamp or desert is fucking genius.

  • Celivalg@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, sad thing is we are already signed up for the next 20 years, as in even if we stopped emitting everything tomorrow, we would still have +2°C in 20 years…

    And how realistic is stopping everything tomorow?

    +3°C… we would need to have a new coronavirus crisis every years, not just a new one, but stack them on top, in terms of emissions. Ofc you can’t have more then one global confinement at a time (doesn’t make sense to double confine someone) so that wouldn’t even work.

    We. Are. Fucked.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We aren’t locked in for the next twenty years, only the next ten years.

      We could build a thousand RBMK like nuclear reactors in a decade and then suck out 50 ppm of CO2 out of the atmosphere in another decade.

      Would cost $500B to $1T or so.

      We just don’t really think global warming is serious enough to warrant an action plan at the scale of the Manhattan project, Apollo program or Messmer plan.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re not locked in for the next 20 years. Not for the next 10.

        The carbon in the atmosphere is going to be there for the next millenium and the temperature won’t level out till the 2100s if we stopped all carbon emission right this second.

        Furthermore, if we did stop all emissions right now, the planet would get 0.5-1.5 °C hotter within a year or two due to the end of the aerosol pollution cooling effect that’s been cutting the effects of carbon induced climate change in half this whole time.

        This year is so hot because they put limitations on sulfur emissions from shipping boats in the Pacific. Those emissions were cooling the atmosphere, but the aerosol emissions (which that sulfur is one of) only last in the atmosphere for about 2 weeks before they’re rained out of the air.

        We’re fucked.

  • sadreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    to be fair records only go back like 200 years tho but it is still telling about the direction

    • morsebipbip@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      TBF you can also pretty know the temperature from thousands of years ago somehow accurately by analysing ice from the polar caps

        • heeplr@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yearly. They look at slices generated by compressed layers of snowfall. Thick layer = cold year. They look at more stuff but that’s roughly how it works.

          edit: not sure why you’re downvoted. It’s a good question.

          • Siegfried@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            not sure why you’re downvoted. It’s a good question.

            The herd acts in mysterious ways… one would have thought we left those practices in the R-site…