War crimes are not allowed under international law as part of a tit-for-tat.
There is some nuance here, where some war crimes could make what would normally be a warcrime by the other side not a war crime. For instance, it is a war crime to attack medics, and it is a warcrime for combatants to pose as medics. However, if a country commits the warcrime of having combatants pose as medics, it is no longer a warcrime to attack that countries medics.
Noob question: are war crimes ok if its tit for tat or is he really wanted by hague now?
Why do you think the USA wants to dismantle the ICC?
Oh the Americans and Jewish™ Nazis never signed up for the ICC. Out of bounds. Not under their jurisdiction.
Checkmate,
liberalshumanitarians.War crimes are not allowed under international law as part of a tit-for-tat.
There is some nuance here, where some war crimes could make what would normally be a warcrime by the other side not a war crime. For instance, it is a war crime to attack medics, and it is a warcrime for combatants to pose as medics. However, if a country commits the warcrime of having combatants pose as medics, it is no longer a warcrime to attack that countries medics.
Is it a war crime to forget to mention the trump-epstein files?