• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1か月前

    How’s opsec going to help against a rat anyway? If an insider gives out information, you’re toast anyway, unless you have some kind of a cell network going on like some terrorist organizations and that’s, uh, a bit too much for organizing an union

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1か月前

      OpSec includes vetting people and structuring your organization in a way that frustrates a rat’s ability to gain access to sensitive information.

      Having a structured internal network for the union isn’t “a bit much”, it’s a basic necessity to proper organization.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1か月前

        And yet - if the people organizing are completely anonymous and you can’t even know for sure they’re your coworkers, would you trust them?

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1か月前

          If you’re allowing anonymous people into your private server you have failed in your OpSec.

          The solution to this is to not allow anonymous people into a private server used for organizing. You vet them first before giving access. Basic OpSec 101.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1か月前

      Like saying how is a fire extinguisher going to help a house fire.

      Point is, good opsec prevents it from becoming a house fire.

    • vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1か月前

      SimpleX makes you anonymous and messages can’t be attributed to you. HR would probably believe screenshots still. If people identify themselves on the chat, and they don’t have to.