Bambu PET-CF printed with orientation to test layer strength. Results very similar to PA6-GF except PA6-GF breaks like glass, not on the layer lines. To be clear, it’s possible to use better orientations and custom model changes to reinforce things, I don’t consider that reliable though.
The 43X got around 6 shots before splitting apart. This is the 6th attempt with various filaments and models of 43X, they all suck. Using Aves rails. Might have buy the real thing.
The 1911 fired one single 45 and it’s done. Machined the rail myself 6061. First attempt. It’s too bad, this thing was so smooth.
That’s good to know. I initially wanted to print PA6-CF, but was skeptical of longevity concerns. I also wouldn’t say he “brain washed” me. I was looking into it and first looked on Bambu’s website comparing the dry state and wet state, and the wet state bended significantly more than the dry one. I just assumed that would cause some sort of failure, especially since we’re putting external parts into a printed frame.
I didn’t mean that you were brain washed, I meant that there are so many that have strayed away from nylon and think that pet-cf is the way to go due to Hoffman posting his video. Don’t get me wrong, Hoffman is a great developer. However, I don’t think he put much testing into his theory on this. Pet-cf is great for mags and accessories.
Polymaker pa6gf25 has been great in my experiences, as long as its not annealed the filled nylons get quite brittle post anneal if my XD45 survives the weekend, it will be over 200 rounds on an un annealed frame