• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 14th, 2025

help-circle






  • I did, but I got the FA permissions for were I live, so I basically kept it stock, if you can get that that’s what I recommend, but if you dont, rather than modifying the original fcg, It’s better if you make the ar fcg mod, has a better trigger feel than stock and I’ve heard guys saying its more reliable, my guess its cuzs the ar fcg is made out of metal, but it IS more work, though it seems worth it IMO


  • They are more of a longevity thing in my opinion, although to be honest my trunnion is not showing much signs of wear, granted my 556 reciever has only seen around 500 shots, and my 300bo reciever around 100, so mine are not on the abused side of things. If you intend to put thousands of rounds into it, quickly, I would go for it though.

    Granted the piece totals to about 50g of filament, and with the kilogram at $80 in polymaker pa6cf20, you would have to run through 25 nylon trunnions before you equalize the price of the one offered by V in his site(here if you wanna check it out, its on discount: https://3dprintfreedom.com/product/nylaug-aluminum-trunnion/), however, it does have the benefit of putting metal right on the chamber, so on the safety side you can guess how much more peace of mind you can have knowing an OOB would probably not explode your face as hard as on the printed one… though the mechanism of the aug seems to prevent it on its own, hammer won’t hit the bullet unless bolt is fully seated, but it does also remove some of the heat in the area since it has better conductivity and more thermal mass than the printed trunnion…

    Anyway I think I’m getting derailed, I dont think the aluminium trunnion is fully necessary, but if you can purchase one, it is a nice to have, as I said 3dprintfredom has it on discount right now if you want it(its the link above).




  • I’ve not done plain ppa… but ppacf does hold up pretty well, and I suspect that plain ppa for frames and the like it should hold pretty well since it has really good layer adhesion, and ppacf has worse layer adhesion

    Pps-cf I find I dont like much for frames and lowers but I love it for suppressors, it has great thermal resistance, but its too brittle in my experience, dunno bout plan pps however but it should give you an idea, plain should be less brittle and better layer adhesion but worse thermal resitance


  • We bought ours from mutedmachineworks.com

    I’ll be honest though, the baffles you can make by drilling the holes are not that good, I buy only the tubes and end caps and 3d print the baffles, often add the metal baffles at the beginning so it absorbs the blast instead of the nylon, I feel it last longer that way… 3d printed baffles have way better performance than the metal ‘emitters’ they sell, plus less drilling, since you only do the softer end cap, and the ocassional shield baffle lol

    Last attempt was really good for 9mm and 556, slightly more sound than a hubtn4(due to the smaller volume) but also smaller size and looks dope.

    I dont remember exactly but some folks have made baffles to 3d print for the fake airsoft aluminium cans, pistons and other stuff…

    I personally made mine using ftn mega pack that has the ‘D-cell’ baffles, just scale them to your tube and that’s it, I also tried to extract the baffles from a hubtn4 for each caliber but it was quite a hassle… it did perform better though, sadly had to make tons of cuts and negative spaces in orca that I can’t find the time to do again(my hdd died, and those baffles with it).

    And I bet trem-mango could do a way better job than me, since mine were janky af

    Oh, and I put a yhm hub on them

    captured_image9049738115649866012